1-20 of 746 Search Results for

wear surfaces

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 November 2013
Fig. 10 Typical wear surfaces. Source: Ref 7 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2013
Fig. 11 Wear surfaces on common tools due to the tool motion, V . Source: Ref 7 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2003
Fig. 1 Interfacial wear processes. (a) Initial contact of the two surfaces. (b) Running-in process where the soft polymer molecules are gradually transferred to the hard counterface as third body. (c) Steady-state wear process where the wear and friction phenomena are influenced mainly More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Fig. 25 Abrasive wear. (a) Free particle between two surfaces. (b) Particle attached to one of the surfaces. (c) Sharp asperity. (d) Erosion More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 12.6 Two-body abrasion wear rates of various roller surfaces subjected to abrasion by silica-coated tape, where * indicates not age hardened. PVD, physical vapor deposition; TS, thermal spray More
Image
Published: 30 April 2020
Fig. 11.10 Example wear surface pattern taken from the geometry found in snake skin. This is an example of biologically inspired design. Powder-binder processing routes, such as via additive manufacturing, provide a means to adjust morphology and composition to mimic such a structure. More
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 March 2001
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.secwr.t68350001
EISBN: 978-1-62708-315-7
... Abstract This chapter begins with a brief review of the different types of surface treatments and coatings used in industry and their effect on properties and performance. It then discusses the importance of corrosion and wear treatments and the consequences of failing to properly implement...
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 March 2001
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.secwr.9781627083157
EISBN: 978-1-62708-315-7
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 12.17 Effect of die surface treatment on tool wear. Source: Ref 12.2 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2003
Fig. 14 Wear marks on the surface of a nylon/polyethylene antifriction bearing. The bearing was in contact with a rotating steel shaft. 417×. Source: Ref 53 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2003
Fig. 7 (a) Abrasive wear mechanisms and surface deformation as a function of pressure, P; material hardness, H; and fracture energy, G Ic . L , normal load; V , velocity. (b) Curves 1 to 3 correspond to the schematic in (a), possible schematic of the wear rate, W , as a function More
Image
Published: 01 December 2003
Fig. 16 (Part 1) Wear failure of polyether-imide (PEI) and composites. (a) Failed surface of PEI while sliding against very smooth ( R a , 0.06 μm) aluminum surface, resulting in high friction coefficient (normal load, L , 28 N; velocity, V , 2.1 m/s), Left part shows severe melt flow More
Image
Published: 01 October 2011
Fig. 16.6 Bronze transfer to a steel surface after adhesive wear during sliding contact. Source: Ref 16.3 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2019
Figure 30 AFM topography image of a worn surface reveals a wear track. More
Image
Published: 01 March 2001
Fig. 2 Surface engineering processes used to prevent wear. CVD, chemical vapor deposition; PVD, physical vapor deposition; EB, electron beam More
Image
Published: 01 March 2001
Fig. 3 Major categories of wear based on abrasion, erosion, adhesion, and surface fatigue. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 8.6 Railroad track spalling from rolling wear and surface fatigue More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 6.21 Surface treatment effects on tool wear in U-channel drawing of dual-phase steels, thickness 1 mm (0.04 in.). GGG70L, spheroid graphite-bearing cast iron, flame hardened; 1.2379, tool steel (X155CrMo12/1; U.S. D2; Japan SKD 11). Source: Ref 6.3 More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 12.7 Three-body abrasive wear of surface treatments tested with the ASTM International G65 dry sand/rubber wheel abrasion test, Procedure C. Plotted data are the average of four tests per surface treatment, where * indicates not heat treated, and ** indicates aged 2 h at 650 °F. More
Image
Published: 01 December 2003
Fig. 4 Bearing surface of an aluminum extrusion die, demonstrating the wear process due to hot aluminum extrusion. (a) Untreated die. (b) Die with nitrided surface More