Fig. 13.1 Comparison of fiber volume fraction to fiber weight fraction More

Fig. 12.9 (Part 3) (d) Variation with depth of carbon content, volume fraction of pearlite in the normalized condition, and hardness in the quenched-and-tempered condition for the decarburized 0.4% C steel shown in Fig. 12.9 (Part 1) (a) to (c) . More

Fig. 7.3 (Part 3) (f) Approximate variation with time of the volume fraction of pearlite spheroidized in a 0.8% C normalized steels treated three ways: (1) Annealed: annealed at 700 °C. (2) Cold deformed at annealed: reduced 50% by compression at room temperature and then annealed at 700 °C More

Fig. 7.6 (Part 3) (i) Variation with time of the volume fraction of graphite formed, and of the hardness, of a 1% C steel heated at 650 °C. More

Fig. 8.2 (Part 4) (j) Variation with time of the volume fraction of austenite formed in a spheroidized 0.8% C steel heated at 730 °C. The variation in hardness after quenching and tempering at 200 °C also is shown. This graph applies to the specimens Fig. 8.2 (Part 1) (a) to (h) . More

Fig. 7.5 Variation of volume fraction of transformed martensite with strain in flanged cup. Source: Ref 7.2 More

Fig. 13.12 Evolution of phase volume fraction of ε-martensite with strain. Source: Ref 13.4 More

Fig. 5.3 Volume fraction measurement on a steel sample Sr. No. Bainite (black areas), vol% Martensite (white areas), vol% 1 43.9 54.3 2 35.9 61.8 3 38.9 59.7 4 39.3 59.1 5 37.1 61.9 Avg 39.02 59.36 More

Fig. 9.52 Volume fraction and size for typical second-phase particles in steels. Non-metallic inclusions (see Chapter 8, “Solidification, Segregation, and Nonmetallic Inclusions,” in this book) normally have a combination of size and distribution out of the region where second phase More

Fig. 13.13 Equilibrium austenite volume fraction for the dual-phase steel in Fig. 13.11 . The experimentally measured Ac 1 and Ac 3 are included. For 7 °C and 60 °C/s (13 °F and 110 °F/s) the transformation temperatures did not change significantly. Source: Ref 6 More

Fig. 13.15 Volume fraction of austenite formed during the treatments inside the critical zone indicated in Fig. 13.14 , as determined by quantitative metallography. Source: Ref 6 More

Fig. 14.34 Intragranular ferrite volume fraction in the samples shown in Fig. 14.33 . Each point is identified with the same letter used to identify the micrographs in Fig. 14.33 . Source: Ref 32 More

Fig. 15.10 Austenite volume fraction f γ as a function of austempering holding time. The solid line represents the values of the austenite volume fraction at 230 °C (445 °F) determined through dilatometry. The circles represent the values of the volume fraction of austenite at room More

Fig. 5.55 Effect of dihedral angle on the volume fraction for freestanding structural rigidity. Source: Ref 73 More

Figure 6-23 Inclusion volume fraction measurements of nine samples with varying sulfur contents using image analysis with 16×, 32×, and 80 × objectives. The trend line shown was plotted by using the least-squares method to fit all the data points. (From Vander Voort, Ref. 61, courtesy More

Fig. 4.4 Hardness versus particle diameter in a low-γ′-volume-fraction nickel-base superalloy. Source: Ref 1 More

Fig. 5.11 Example of a fibrous eutectic microstructure with a small volume fraction of one phase (molybdenum fibers in NiAl matrix). Transverse section of a directionally-solidified (DS) sample. As-polished. Courtesy of E. Blank. Source: Ref 5.6 More

Fig. 5.6 Loading curve showing mixture density versus solid volume fraction for a stainless steel powder. The peak density corresponds to the critical solids loading. Source: Mukund et al. ( Ref 1 ) More

Fig. 1 Relationship between heat-affected zone (HAZ) volume fraction of martensite and the P cm carbon equivalents of thermally cycled specimens. Four thermal programs are included: (1) peak temperature ( T p ) = 1350 °C (2460 °F), cooling time from 800 to 500 °C (Δ t 8/5 ) = 3 s; (2) T More

Fig. 9.9 Effect of reinforcement volume fraction on the properties of aluminum metal-matrix composites. (a) The ultimate tensile strength (UTS), tensile yield strength (TYS), and strain-to-failure (ε f ) for 6013/SiC/ xx p-T6. (b) Fracture toughness as a function of SiC volume fraction. (c More