Fig. 8.6 Tensile strength and formability during hot forming. UTS, ultimate tensile strength. Source: Ref 8.6 More

Fig. 8.6 Tensile strength and formability during hot forming. UTS, ultimate tensile strength. Source: Ref 8.7 More

Fig. 11.1 Effect of carbon content on steel strength. UTS, ultimate tensile strength; YS, yield strength More

Fig. 8.51 Ultimate tensile strength (UTS), yield strength (YS), and elongation of Ti-6Al-4V alloy produced using various additive manufacturing processes. DMD, direct-metal deposition; HIP, hot isostatic pressing; HT, heat treatment; LENS, laser-engineered net shaping ( Ref 8.16 ); DMLS More

Fig. 2.36 Strength across fusion weld joint. Ultimate tensile strength values are estimated from hardness readings. Source: Ref 2.26 More

Fig. 1 Effect of carbon content on steel strength. UTS, ultimate tensile strength; YS, yield strength. Source: Ref 1 More

Fig. 4.4 Ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of sintered 409L as a function of lubricant type and sintered density. Source: Ref 6 . Reprinted with permission from MPIF, Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton, NJ More

Fig. 11.11 Effect of test temperature on ultimate tensile strength of a nickel-base alloy in conventionally cast, directionally solidified, and single-crystal (monocrystaloy) form. Source: Ref 11.18 More

Fig. 6.10 Relationship between ultimate tensile strength and proof stress for a Ni-Cr-Mo carburizing steel. Derived from Ref 3 More

Fig. 6.11 Relationship between the ultimate tensile strength and the 0.2% proof stress (offset yield) of carburizing steels (0.08-0.18% C). Note that with carbon contents of over 0.18%, the ratio can be as low as 1.15 for strengths over about 200 ksi (44 HRC). Data from Ref 3 More

Fig. 10.36 Approximate relationship between ultimate tensile strength and hardness (HB) for steels in the quenched and tempered, normalized, and “as hot-worked” condition. More

Fig. 6.2 Total elongation versus ultimate tensile strength “banana curve” of automotive steels. Source: Ref 6.3 More

Figure 12.4 Temperature dependence of ultimate tensile strength of fabric-reinforced polymer-matrix laminates. All data are for the warp direction except for G-10CR and G-11CR, where fill direction strengths are indicated by//// for 295 K and \\\\ for 76 and 4 K. Wt.% = fiber weight fraction More

Fig. 17.5 Drop in ultimate tensile strength with increase in temperature for grade S-65C. Source: Goods and Dombrowski 1998 More

Fig. 17.10 Ultimate tensile strength of hot-pressed blocks as a function of temperature, comparing grade S-200F with grade S-200E beryllium in transverse and longitudinal directions. Source: Haws 1985 More

Fig. 17.25 Temperature dependence of ultimate tensile strength of a polycrystalline isostatic pressure forging of beryllium. ○, parallel to forging direction; •, perpendicular to forging direction. Source: Lavrent’ev et al. 1987 More

Fig. 17.61 Effect of grain size on the ultimate tensile strength as a function of temperature of vacuum hot-pressed (QMV) beryllium. Source: Beaver and Wikle 1954 More

Fig. 17.62 Effect of the average grain size on the ultimate tensile strength as a function of temperature of vacuum hot-pressed and hot-extruded (QMV) beryllium. Source: Beaver and Wikle 1954 More

Fig. 20.23 Comparison of longitudinal and transverse ultimate tensile strength as a function of temperature of vacuum hot pressed (QMV) beryllium hot extruded at 1050 °C (1920 °F). Curves A (longitudinal) and B (transverse) are for comparable beryllium extrusions; curve C (transverse More

Fig. 15 Ultimate tensile strength versus hydrogen porosity for sand-cast bars of three aluminum alloys More