Search Results for surface hardness

Fig. 3 Recommended maximum surface hardness and effective case depth hardness vs. carbon percent for induction-hardened gears More

Fig. 9.2 Recommended maximum surface hardness and effective case depth hardness vs. carbon percent for induction-hardened gears More

Fig. 8.27 Effect of shot hardness and surface hardness on the distribution of residual stresses. (a) 1045 steel hardened to R c 48. (b) 1045 steel hardened to R c 62 peened with 330 shot. Source: Ref 30 More

Fig. 1.27 Relationship between surface hardness and seizure. (a) Relation of hardness, HV, with maximum contact stress, σ max , when destructive seizure occurs for through hardened or induction hardened steels. Source: Ref 42 . (b) Variation of seizing load with microhardness of the outer More

Fig. 16-2 Ranges of surface hardness produced by various surface modification treatments. Source: Ref 8 More

Fig. 16.8 Achievable surface hardness with flame or induction hardening. Source: Ref 16.37 More

Fig. 16 Effect of tempering temperature on surface hardness of water-hardening tool steels austenitized at three different temperatures and quenched in brine. Specimens held for 1 hour at the tempering temperature in a recirculating-air furnace. Cooled in air to room temperature More

Fig. 19 Effect of tempering temperature on surface hardness of S1 and S5 shock-resisting tool steels More

Fig. 5.10 Effect of section size on surface hardness of 0.54% carbon steel. Source: Ref 2 More

Fig. 9-2 Effect of hardening temperature on the surface hardness of various S1 steels. Curves 1 and 5, Allegheny Ludlum Industries; Curves 2 and 3, Bethlehem Steel Co.; curve 4, Latrobe Steel Co. Curve Composition, % Quenching medium Specimen size C Si W Cr V 1 0.43 More

Fig. 9-17 Surface hardness of as-quenched rounds of various silicon tool steels as a function of austenitizing temperature and quenching medium, (a) 0.46% C, 1.60% Si, 0.80% Mn, and 0.40% Mo. Courtesy of Allegheny Ludlum Industries, (b) 0.55% C, 2.30% Si, 0.80% Mn, 0.50% Mo, and 0.25% V More

Fig. 11-3 Effect of austenitizing temperature on the surface hardness of A-type steels. Specimens were air cooled from the austenitizing temperatures. Curves 1 and 2, Allegheny Ludlum Industries; curve 3, Bethlehem Steel Co.; curve 4, Universal-Cyclops Steel Corp. Curve Type More

Fig. 15-11 Effect of tempering temperature on the surface hardness of carburized P20 steel. Curve A is for specimens carburized at 845 °C (1550 °F) and curve B is for specimens carburized at 900 °C (1650 °F). Courtesy of O.I. Lemmer, Teledyne VASCO More

Fig. 3 Variation of tooth surface hardness with tempering temperature of carburized and hardened AISI 8620H gears More

Fig. 5.2 Variation of tooth surface hardness with tempering temperature of carburized and hardened AISI 8620H gears More

Fig. 5.40 Surface hardness vs. case depth at different locations of a tooth along face width More

Fig. 14 Effect of section size on surface hardness of a 0.54% carbon steel quenched in water from 830 °C (1525 °F). Source: Ref 9 More

Fig. 8.29 Effect of shot peening and fatigue stressing on surface hardness. Source: Ref 31 More

Fig. 4.10 Influence of retained austenite on the surface hardness of carburized alloy steels. Reheat quenched and tempered at 150 to 185 °C More

Fig. 1 Relationship of carbon content to minimum surface hardness attainable by flame or induction heating and water quenching. Practical minimum carbon content can be determined from this curve. Source: Ref 1 More