Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
stress intensity factor
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 456 Search Results for
stress intensity factor
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
in Static and Dynamic Fracture Toughness of Metals
> Mechanics and Mechanisms of Fracture: An Introduction
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 4.20 Stress corrosion cracking velocity versus stress intensity factor. (a) Type A, dotted line; type B, solid line. (b) Type C behavior
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2003
Fig. 8 An S-shaped fatigue crack propagation. K , stress-intensity factor; K c , fracture toughness curve indicating its three characteristic regions.
More
Image
in Stress-Corrosion Cracking of Carbon and Low-Alloy Steels (Yield Strengths Less Than 1241 MPa)[1]
> Stress-Corrosion Cracking<subtitle>Materials Performance and Evaluation</subtitle>
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 2.5 Schematic of stress intensity factor vs. crack velocity obtained using fracture mechanics methods. Stage II (plateau) velocity and K ISCC are identified. Source: Ref 2.30
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Image
in Properties and Performance of Aluminum Castings
> Aluminum Alloy Castings: Properties, Processes, and Applications
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 8.26 Fatigue crack growth rate ( R = 0.1) versus stress-intensity factor at room temperature for A356.0-T6 aluminum alloy castings produced by various processes
More
Image
in Properties and Performance of Aluminum Castings
> Aluminum Alloy Castings: Properties, Processes, and Applications
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 8.27 Fatigue crack growth rate ( R = 0.5) versus stress-intensity factor at room temperature for A356.0-T6 aluminum alloy castings produced by various processes
More
Image
in Properties and Performance of Aluminum Castings
> Aluminum Alloy Castings: Properties, Processes, and Applications
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 8.29 Creep crack growth as a function of applied stress-intensity factor for selected wrought aluminum alloys
More
Image
in Life-Assessment Techniques for Combustion Turbines
> Damage Mechanisms and Life Assessment of High-Temperature Components
Published: 01 December 1989
Fig. 9.54. Creep-crack-growth rates as a function of stress-intensity factor for IN 738 LC and IN 939 at 850 °C (1560 °F) in air ( Ref 9 and 84 ).
More
Image
Published: 01 December 1989
Image
Published: 01 December 1989
Fig. 3.30. Crack-growth rate vs stress-intensity factor for (a) Inconel 738 and (b) Inconel 939 ( Ref 158 ).
More
Image
in High-Entropy Alloys
> Mechanical Behavior of High-Entropy Alloys: Key Topics in Materials Science and Engineering
Published: 01 February 2022
Fig. 3 The fatigue-crack growth rate vs. stress intensity factor range for HEAs and other conventional alloys. Source: Ref 60 – 73
More
Image
Published: 01 December 1995
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 5.3 Stress-intensity factors for a through-thickness crack subjected to uniform far-field tension. Source: Ref 5.8
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 5.4 Stress-intensity factors for cracks emanating from a circular hole. Data points: Paris and Sih. Solid lines: uniaxial tension (Newman’s fit). Dotted lines:equi-biaxial tension (Liu’s fit). Source: Ref 5.6 , 5.7 , 5.11
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 5.5 Stress-intensity factors for central crack loaded in a retangular plate with opposite forces at the center of the crack, where P is the force (load) per unit thickness. Source: Ref 5.12
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 5.11 Normalized stress-intensity factors for single through-thickness cracks emanating from a straight lug subjected to a pin loading applied in the 0° loading direction. Source: Ref 5.15
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 5.12 Normalized stress-intensity factors for single through-thickness cracks emanating from a tapered lug subjected to a pin loading applied in the 0° loading direction. Source: Ref 5.15
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 5.13 Normalized stress-intensity factors for single through-thickness cracks emanating from a tapered lug subjected to a pin loading applied in the 180° loading direction. Source: Ref 5.15
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 5.14 Normalized stress-intensity factors for single through-thickness cracks emanating from a tapered lug subjected to a pin loading applied in the −45° loading direction and its reversed direction, R o / R i = 2.25. Source: Ref 5.15
More
1