1-20 of 882 Search Results for

stress distribution

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 August 2005
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.mmfi.t69540373
EISBN: 978-1-62708-309-6
... Abstract This appendix presents a close-form solution to determine the stress distribution around a hole of any shape or size in a strip of any material of any width. It also compares the close-form equation to classical solutions and the results of finite element analysis, demonstrating near...
Image
Published: 30 November 2013
Fig. 2 Elastic stress distribution: pure torsion. (a) No stress concentration. *All stress components—tension, shear, and compression—have equal magnitude. (b) Transverse hole stress concentration. **Tension and compression stress components increase more than shear stress at a torsional More
Image
Published: 30 November 2013
Fig. 9 Crack-tip stress distribution. The stress field ahead of a sharp crack is characterized by a single parameter, K (or K I for mode I loading). Under linear-elastic conditions, the K I stress field increases from the nominal stress, approaching infinite magnitude at the crack tip More
Image
Published: 01 October 2011
Fig. 7.18 Stress distribution ahead of a crack in which small-scale plasticity is included More
Image
Published: 01 October 2011
Fig. 16.8 Stress distribution in contacting surfaces due to rolling, sliding, and combined effect More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Fig. 18 Residual-stress distribution and retained austenite content in case-hardened steels More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Fig. 69 Residual-stress distribution of carburized SAE 1018 steel with a film-carbide layer formed due to a high carburizing potential. The surface layer consisted of 16% Fe 3 C, 16% retained austenite, and the balance was as-quenched martensite. More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 2.3 Schematic of stress distribution and deformation upon impact of a sphere onto a flat surface, after different impact durations (a,b). The dashed line indicates the Hertzian cone of highest shear stress within particle and substrate; the arrows indicate the direction of material flow. More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Fig. 45 Axial stress distribution at various depths below the surface during single-shot induction surface hardening. Source: Ref 50 More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Fig. 65 Residual-stress distribution in the induction surface-hardened layer of the gear tooth. Source: Ref 15 , 20 More
Image
Published: 31 December 2020
Fig. 14 Comparison of the level of stress distribution in two steels of similar chemical composition but different grain size, after identical heal treatments. Internal stresses are considerably greater in the coarse-grained steel (b). More
Image
Published: 01 February 2005
Fig. 22.24 (a) Normal stress distribution for original punch geometry. (b) Normal stress distribution for modified punch geometry (A, face; B, lower punch corner; C, cone angle; D, fillet radius; E, edge) [ Lange et al., 1992b ] More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 2.12 Development of stress distribution as tension in the sheet increases. Source: Ref 2.10 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 3.64 Schematic stress distribution through the tension side of a case-carburized bending specimen More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. A2.2 Tangential stress distribution adjacent to a circular hole in an isotropic sheet of infinite width. Comparison of the simple analysis ( Eq A2.5b ) with Timoshenko’s equation ( Eq A2.2 ). Source: Ref A2.1 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. A2.3 Tangential stress distribution adjacent to a circular hole in an isotropic sheet (hole diameter to width ratio: D/W = 0.3, 0.5). Comparison of the simple analysis ( Eq A2.5b ) with Howland’s solution. Source: Ref A2.1 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. A2.4 Tangential stress distribution adjacent to a circular hole in an isotropic sheet ( D/W = 0.9091). Comparison of the simple analysis ( Eq A2.5b ) and finite element analysis results. Source: Ref A2.1 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. A2.5 Tangential stress distribution adjacent to an elliptical hole in an isotropic sheet ( D/W = 0). Comparison of the simple analysis ( Eq A2.5a ) with Inglis’ solution. Source: Ref A2.1 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. A2.6 Tangential stress distribution adjacent to a circular hole in an orthotropic sheet ( D/W = 0). Comparison of the simple analysis ( Eq A2.5a ) with the Lekhnitskii solution. Source: Ref A2.1 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. A2.7 Tangential stress distribution adjacent to a circular hole in an orthotropic sheet ( D/W = 0.5). Comparison of the simple analysis ( Eq A2.5b ) and finite element analysis results. Source: Ref A2.1 More