1-20 of 461 Search Results for

specimen orientation

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 August 2005
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.mmfi.t69540395
EISBN: 978-1-62708-309-6
... Abstract This appendix contains figures that illustrate specimen orientation and crack plane codes for rolled plate, drawn bars, and hollow cylinders. drawn bars fracture plane hollow cylinders rolled plate specimen orientation Fig. A6.1 Conventional specimen orientation code...
Image
Published: 30 November 2013
Fig. 6 Specimen orientation scheme showing longitudinal, long transverse, and short transverse directionality. Six possible specimen designations are: L-S, L-T, S-L, S-T, T-L, and T-S. The first letter denotes the direction of the applied load; the second letter denotes the direction of crack More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 8.7 Standard notation for specimen orientation. More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. A6.1 Conventional specimen orientation code. Arrows indicate loading directions. L, longitudinal; T, transverse; S, short transverse. Note that T is the same as LT, or long-transverse; LS is also used for short-transverse. The axis of a tension test specimen is always parallel More
Image
Published: 01 October 2011
Fig. 7.20 Specimen orientation scheme showing the longitudinal, long-transverse, and short-transverse directions More
Image
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 35 Specimen orientation scheme showing the longitudinal, long transverse, and short transverse directions. There are six possible specimen designations: L-S, L-T, S-L, S-T, T-L, and T-S. The first letter denotes the direction of the applied load; the second letter denotes the direction More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 11 Specimen orientation and fracture plane identification. L, length, longitudinal, principal direction of metal working (rolling, extrusion, axis of forging); T, width, long-transverse grain direction; S, thickness, short-transverse grain direction; C, chord of cylindrical cross section More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 17.29 Specimen orientation and fracture plane identification. L, length, longitudinal, principal direction of metal working (rolling, extrusion, axis of forging); T, width, long-transverse grain direction; S, thickness, short-transverse grain direction; C, chord of cylindrical cross More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 9.9 Effect of sulfur content and specimen orientation on the upper shelf impact energy of rolled carbon steel plate. Source: Ref 9.38 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 9.10 Effect of sulfur content and specimen orientation on impact toughness as a function of test temperature for 4340 plate steels hardened and tempered to two strength levels. Source: Ref 9.39 More
Image
Published: 01 March 2002
Fig. 7.34 Mount with a L-shaped strip to indicate specimen orientation More
Image
Published: 01 December 1995
Fig. 3-38 Effect of test specimen orientation and location on the tension test properties of a 150 lb (68 kg) wheel forging of water quenched and tempered AISI 1050 steel. Each bar on the chart represents maximum, minimum, and average values of three tests. ( 3 ) More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 17 Tensile specimen orientation to determine r 0 , r 45 , and r 90 in rolled sheet. More
Image
Published: 01 March 2006
Fig. 9.8 Orientation of crack in fracture specimen to major forming directions in plate stock. Source: Ref 9.14 More
Image
Published: 01 March 2002
Fig. 12.82 Effect of thermal solidification gradient, orientation of specimen relative to 〈001〉 direction, and HIP on strain-controlled LCF behavior of CMSX-2 alloy at 760 °C (1400 °F). Test frequency = 0.33 Hz. (a) strain vs. N f and (b) stress vs. N f More
Image
Published: 01 December 2001
Fig. 3 Bar graphs comparing (a) K lc and (b) K SCC (circumferential-radial specimen orientation) of low-cobalt-bearing, standard, and cobalt-free 18Ni-250 maraging steels. K ISCC testing was conducted in a marine atmosphere. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 3.20 Bar graphs comparing (a) K IC and (b) K ISCC (circumferential-radial specimen orientation) of low-cobalt-bearing, standard, and cobalt-free 18Ni-250. K ISCC testing was conducted in a marine atmosphere. Source: Ref 3.3 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2013
Fig. 11 Comparison of properties of steel rotor forgings made from ESR and conventionally melted ingots. (a) Impact strength of grade X22CrMoV121. (b) Fracture toughness of grade 30CrMoNiV511. Specimen orientation and location are indicated next to curves. Source: Ref 9 to 11 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. A6.3 ASTM crack plane orientation identification code for specimens tilted with respect to reference direction. First letter: normal to the fracture plane (loading direction); second letter: direction of crack propagation in fracture plane More
Image
Published: 01 November 2007
Fig. 6.2 Orientation of the longitudinal and transverse Charpy specimens cut from steel sheet with sulfide stringer inclusions More