1-20 of 1029 Search Results for

specific heat

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Book Chapter

By L. L. Sparks
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 June 1983
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.mlt.t62860047
EISBN: 978-1-62708-348-5
... using the density at 293 K ( ρ = 2699 kg·m –3 ) and the thermal contraction at low temperatures from Corruccini and Gniewek (1961) . d Specific heat at constant pressure from Corruccini and Gniewek (1960) . The ratio <italic>∊</italic><sub>1</sub>/<italic>kT</italic> that satisfies...
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 2.3 Specific heat of diamond calculated using (a) Einstein’s specific heat function and θ E = 1326 K, (b) Debye’s specific heat function and θ D = 2050 K, and (c) experimental data (o— Desnoyers and Morrison, 1958 ). Dashed lines indicate a T 3 temperature dependence More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 2.1 Specific heat as a function of temperature for several types of material. Typical behaviors are illustrated for metals (aluminum, beryllium, and copper), semiconductors (carbon and silicon), an amorphous inorganic (Pyrex glass) ( Corruccini and Gniewek, 1960 ), and for an organic More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 2.7 Temperature dependence of the electronic contribution to the specific heat. More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 2.10 Specific heat of NiSO 4 ·6H 2 O (Δ— Stout and Hadley, 1964 ) and holmium (▪— Lounasmaa, 1962 and □— van Kemper, Miedema, and Huiskamp, 1964 ) as a function of temperature. The observed Schottky effect is a result of cooperative electronic spin alignment in the case of NiSO 4 ·6H 2 More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 2.12 Electronic specific heat for superconducting vanadium expressed as C ES / γT C vs. T C / T . Experimental data ( Corak, Goodman, Satterthwaite, and Wexler, 1954 ) are well represented by the energy-gap formula (---) over the entire temperature range whereas the T 3 More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 2.13 Ratio of specific heat to molar volume and temperature as a function of T 2 for a composite of niobium wires. These data include the specific heat of the addenda. The specimen was cooled prior to application of a 0.1-T field ( McConville and Serin, 1964 ). More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 2.15 Components of total specific heat in copper. The cubic lattice term is dominate except at very low temperatures. More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 2.19 Specific heat of copper calculated using θ D = 310 K and θ D = 348 K. Experimental points (□— Sandenaw, 1959 ) are included for comparison. The electronic contribution (see Fig. 2.15 ) has been removed from the 5-K experimental point. More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 2.20 Specific heat as a function of temperature for five composite materials. The true shapes of the fiber-reinforced composite curves are somewhat uncertain because of the widely spaced data points. The calculated values for the polystyrene foam are based on 98 wt.% polystyrene and 2 More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 3.26 Temperature dependence of the constant, Q 0 , relating specific heat to volume expansivity for the Cu-Ni system. More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 3.27 Dependence on composition of the constant Qo relating specific heat to volume expansivity for the Cu-Ni system. More
Image