Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
shear testing
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 564 Search Results for
shear testing
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Fig. 14.24 Combined compression shear test method. ITTRI, Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute
More
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Image
Published: 01 November 2011
Image
Published: 01 September 2011
Fig. 8.12 Schematic representation of Iosipescu shear test fixture and specimen (ASTM D 5379). Source: Ref 8.3
More
Image
in Mechanical Testing and Properties of Plastics: An Introduction[1]
> Characterization and Failure Analysis of Plastics
Published: 01 December 2003
Image
Published: 01 July 2009
Fig. 23.21 Base-and-pin shear specimen used for testing BAg-19 brazing alloy. Source: Grant 1979
More
Book Chapter
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 November 2010
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.scm.t52870351
EISBN: 978-1-62708-314-0
... Abstract This chapter discusses composite testing procedures, including tension, compression, shear, flexure, and fracture toughness testing as well as adhesive shear, peel, and honeycomb flatwise tension testing. It also discusses specimen preparation, environmental conditioning, and data...
Abstract
This chapter discusses composite testing procedures, including tension, compression, shear, flexure, and fracture toughness testing as well as adhesive shear, peel, and honeycomb flatwise tension testing. It also discusses specimen preparation, environmental conditioning, and data analysis.
Image
Published: 01 July 2009
Fig. 23.26 Schematic illustration of cylinder/ring push specimen and test fixture for shear testing of brazed joints. Source: Grant 1979
More
Image
Published: 01 July 2009
Fig. 23.15 Ultimate shear stress versus test temperature for lap-shear specimens of beryllium brazed to beryllium. Source: Marschall 1990
More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 5.37 (a) Bond adhesion strength test setup (ASTM C 633) along with a schematic showing various coating failure modes. (b) Triple-lug shear test setup. Source: Ref 5.79 , 5.84
More
Image
in Cold Spray Applications in Repair and Refurbishment for the Aerospace, Oil and Gas, and Power-Generation Industries
> High Pressure Cold Spray: Principles and Applications
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 11.3 (a) Dense (99.9%) microstructure of Al-6061 cold-sprayed coating on a magnesium substrate. (b) Comparison of wrought vs. cold-sprayed Al-6061 mechanical strength. (c) Bond adhesion test for cold-sprayed aluminum. (d) Lug shear test on different magnesium substrates. (e) Galvanic
More
Image
in Cold Spray Applications in Repair and Refurbishment for the Aerospace, Oil and Gas, and Power-Generation Industries
> High Pressure Cold Spray: Principles and Applications
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 11.3 (a) Dense (99.9%) microstructure of Al-6061 cold-sprayed coating on a magnesium substrate. (b) Comparison of wrought vs. cold-sprayed Al-6061 mechanical strength. (c) Bond adhesion test for cold-sprayed aluminum. (d) Lug shear test on different magnesium substrates. (e) Galvanic
More
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
1