1-20 of 802 Search Results for

sensitivity

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 November 2019
Figure 12 Spectral sensitivity of PEM detectors and silicon transmission for 10μm and 100μm thickness; after [8] . More
Image
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 14 Plot to determine strain-rate sensitivity ( m ). Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 46 Notch sensitivity versus notch radius for steels. Source: Ref 11 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 5.14 Effect of average grain size on the strain-rate sensitivity of flow stress and m for Ti-6Al-4V at 925 °C (1700 °F) More
Image
Published: 01 April 2013
Fig. 11 Spectral sensitivity curves for a type 4 radiographic film, showing exposure required to produce a density of 1.0. Source: Ref 1 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 5.9 Variation of strain-rate sensitivity exponent with plastic strain at various temperatures for various aluminum alloys. Source: Ref 5.4 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 5.18 Effect of austenitizing temperature on microcrack sensitivity. Source: Ref 33 , 37 More
Image
Published: 01 July 1997
Fig. 8 Relative crack sensitivity ratings of selected aluminum (base alloy/filler alloy) combinations More
Image
Published: 01 March 2006
Fig. 8.5 Notch-sensitivity curves for use with theoretical factors K t , figure from Ref 8.6 , results and analysis from Ref 8.9 More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 7.11 Sensitivity of flow stress to strain rate change as a function of temperature for pure copper and pure iron ( Basinski, 1959 ; Basinski and Christian, 1960 ). More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 9.33 Schematic of temperature dependence of negative strain-rate sensitivity of selected (paramagnetic) Fe–Ni–C alloys compared with T ms and T mσ . Alloy content ranges from 15.9 to 23.6 wt. % Ni and 0.29 to 0.96 wt. % C ( Richman and Bolling, 1971 ). More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 10.1 A common version of the liquid-oxygen impact sensitivity tester ( Ranlere, Hood, and Marker, 1972 ). More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 14.17 Thermoelectric sensitivity vs. temperature for thermocouple types E, K, T, and KP vs. Au–0.07 at.% Fe. More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 14.19 Sensitivity as a function of temperature for KP vs. Au–0.07 at.% Fe in the annealed and unannealed states. O – annealed ( Rosenbaum, 1968 ); Δ – hard worked ( Rosenbaum, 1968 ); solid line – annealed ( Sparks and Powell, 1973 ). More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 10 Strain-rate change test, used to determine strain-rate sensitivity, m. See text for discussion. More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 9 Methods for determining strain-rate sensitivity ( m value). (a) Duplicate test method. (b) Changing rate method More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 16 Tensile elongation as a function of the strain-rate sensitivity. Source: Ref 18 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 20 Strain-rate sensitivity ( m ) versus strain rate ( ε ˙ ) for the data corresponding to Fig. 19 . Source: Ref 23 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 33 Elongation as function of the strain-rate sensitivity and (apparent) cavity-growth rate predicted from direct equilibrium simulations. The individual data points represent experimental data. Source: Ref 33 More
Image
Published: 01 October 2011
Fig. 13 Decreasing sensitivity of the Rockwell C hardness. Source: Ref 1 More