1-20 of 532

Search Results for segregation

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 August 2018
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.msisep.t59220129
EISBN: 978-1-62708-259-4
.... It explains how steel shrinks as it solidifies, causing issues such as pipe and voids, and how differences in the solubility of solid and liquid steel lead to compositional heterogeneities or segregation. It describes the dendritic nature of solidification, peritectic and eutectic reactions, microporosity...
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 7.10 Segregation morphologies in aluminum-killed steel ingot. Source: Ref 1 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 22.15 Carbide segregation at center of M2 round bars of various diameters. (a) 27 mm ( 1 1 6 in.). (b) 67 mm ( 2 5 8 in.). (c) 105 mm ( 4 1 8 in.). Original magnification: 100×. Source: Ref 5 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1984
Figure 1-21 Examples of segregation associated with central bursts in extruded AISI 1141 modified steel. The streaks, which consist of martensite, have a hardness of 46 to 58 HRC (Rockwell hardness on the C scale) while the matrix hardness is less than 20 HRC. More
Image
Published: 01 December 1984
Figure 1-22 Macroetching with 10% nital was used to reveal carbide segregation in polished sections from various sizes of rounds of T1 high-speed tool steel. (Diameters in inches below sections.) More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 15.36 Transverse cross sections of rails with different levels of segregation at the center of the web. Etchant: hot hydrochloric acid. Courtesy of M. Oliveira and M. Talarico, CETEC, MG, Brazil. More
Image
Published: 01 December 1989
Fig. 6.26. Correlation of ΔFATT with phosphorus segregation, based on Auger analysis, for Cr-Mo-V steel ( Ref 55 ). More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 5.8 McLean’s grain-boundary segregation equation. The dashed curves in the figure (b) indicate the substantial segregations in consideration of the diffusion rate. More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 5.10 The grain-boundary segregation coefficients of Fe-X systems (11)-(13). The smaller solid solution limits an element has, the larger its grain-boundary segregation coefficient becomes. More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 5.11 The competitive segregation of two kinds of coexistent elements (At a higher temperature, X , the content of which is larger, has a higher segregation concentration. At a lower temperature, Δ E Y g b is larger, and Y occupies grain boundaries.) More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 5.12 Grain-boundary segregation and temperature. (a) Reduction of grain-boundary More
Image
Published: 01 December 1996
Fig. 6-14 Schematic illustration of the formation of ingot segregation. (From same source as Fig. 6-10 ) More
Image
Published: 01 January 2022
Fig. 10.2 Schematic of alloying segregation. Source: Ref 1 More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Fig. 40 (a) Representative view of the chemical segregation (banding). Etched with 2% nital. Original magnification: 50×. (b) Higher magnification of the microstructure showing tempered martensite and bainite. Etched with 2% nital. Original magnification: 400× More
Image
Published: 01 November 2007
Fig. 8.11 Segregation of solute atoms to grain boundaries and resultant solute drag More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 9.20 Remnants of interdendritic segregation in 10V45 steel hot rolled to reduction ratios of (a) 7:1, (b) 10:1, (c) 27:1, and (d) 49:1. Transverse sections, picric acid-sodium tridecylbenzene etch, light micrographs. Courtesy of J. Dyck. Source: Ref 9.58 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 11.11 Longitudinal cross section of the axis of Fig. 11.10 . The segregation has been aligned by hot working, creating the aspect of fibers. This indicates a high degree of deformation in hot working. Etchant: iodine. More
Image
Published: 01 October 2011
Fig. 11.8 Longitudinal sections illustrating carbide segregation at the center of M2 round bars of various diameters. (a) 27 mm (1 1/16 in.). (b) 67 mm (2 5/8 in.). (c) 105 mm (4 1/8 in.). Original magnification: 100×. Source: Ref 11.9 More
Image
Published: 01 April 2013
Fig. 1 Microstructural bonding due to chemical segregation and mechanical working. Source: Ref 1 More
Image
Published: 30 June 2023
Fig. 4.12 Low-magnification photograph of surface segregation on the rolling surface (bottom) of 5182 ingot More