1-20 of 348 Search Results for

rolling-contact fatigue

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 September 2005
Fig. 24 Cleanness and rolling contact fatigue life improvements in carburized steels as steelmaking practices have changed. Source: Ref 57 More
Image
Published: 01 September 2005
Fig. 19 Rolling-contact fatigue in a gear tooth section. Crack origin subsurface. Progression was parallel to surface and inward away from surface. Not etched. Original magnification at 60× More
Image
Published: 01 September 2005
Fig. 20 Rolling-contact fatigue in a gear tooth section. Crack origin subsurface. Progression was parallel with surface, inward, and finally to the surface to form a large pit or spall. Not etched. Original magnification at 60× More
Image
Published: 01 September 2005
Fig. 21 Rolling-contact fatigue in a gear tooth section distinguished by subsurface shear parallel to surface. Note the undisturbed black oxides at the surface, indicating no surface-material movement. Not etched. Original magnification at 125× More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 4.20 Rolling contact fatigue plots for carburized and hardened 3Ni-Cr steel discs. S H = (lb/in. of face width)/(relative radius of curvature) More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 4 Effect of core strength and case depth on the rolling-contact fatigue limit of gear steels. Tests involved two 4 in. disks driven by a 2 in. roller. Test piece may have been either one of the disks or the roller. Relative radius of curvature, 2/3. SH units = lb/in. of face width divided More
Image
Published: 01 June 1985
Fig. 4-17. Gear tooth section, 100×. Unetched. Rolling contact fatigue. Crack origin subsurface. Progression parallel to surface and inward away from surface. More
Image
Published: 01 June 1985
Fig. 4-18. Gear tooth section, 100×. Unetched. Rolling contact fatigue. Crack origin subsurface. Progression parallel with surface, inward, and finally to surface to form a large pit or spall. More
Image
Published: 01 June 1985
Fig. 4-19. Gear tooth section, 200×. unetched. Rolling contact fatigue distinguished by subsurface shear parallel to surface. Note the undisturbed black grain oxides at the surface, indicating no surface material movement. More
Image
Published: 01 June 1985
Fig. 5-14. Spiral bevel tooth, 2×. Pitting and spalling due to rolling contact fatigue in a concentrated area (see Fig. 4-16 ) as a designed failure. More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Fig. 27 Schematic representation of contact fatigue under pure rolling between two surfaces More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Fig. 28 Damage by contact fatigue in rolling combined with sliding conditions in gears produced from a quenched and tempered AISI 8620 carburized steel. (a) Transversal section. (b) Frontal view from a formed cavity More
Image
Published: 01 September 2005
Fig. 3 Schematic of a rolling/sliding contact fatigue (RCF) test More
Book Chapter

Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 June 1985
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.sagf.t63420085
EISBN: 978-1-62708-452-9
... Abstract This chapter presents a detailed discussion on the three most frequent gear failure modes. These include tooth bending fatigue, tooth bending impact, and abrasive tooth wear. Tooth bending fatigue includes surface contact fatigue (pitting), rolling contact fatigue, contact fatigue...
Book Chapter

Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 September 2005
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.gmpm.t51250311
EISBN: 978-1-62708-345-4
... dimensional, surface finish texture, metallurgical, and residual stress. The following section presents the tests that simulate gear action, namely the rolling contact fatigue test, the single-tooth fatigue test, the single-tooth single-overload test, and the single-tooth impact test. Finally, the chapter...
Image
Published: 01 June 1985
Fig. 6-6(a). Spiral bevel pinion, 0.9×. Seven of nine teeth failed by heavy rolling contact fatigue with the origin at a bias across the profile in a confined area. More
Image
Published: 01 October 2011
Fig. 16.9 Crack origin subsurface in a gear tooth section due to rolling-contact fatigue. Progression was parallel to surface and inward away from surface. Not etched. Original magnification: 60× More
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 September 2005
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.gmpm.t51250257
EISBN: 978-1-62708-345-4
... failure analysis. contact fatigue failure analysis fatigue failure gears macropitting micropitting rolling-contact fatigue scuffing spalling stress rupture subcase fatigue thermal fatigue wear GEARS can fail in many different ways, and except for an increase in noise level...
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 1999
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.cmp.t66770001
EISBN: 978-1-62708-337-9
... the appropriate hardness profile and case depth for a given application. Fig. 4 Effect of core strength and case depth on the rolling-contact fatigue limit of gear steels. Tests involved two 4 in. disks driven by a 2 in. roller. Test piece may have been either one of the disks or the roller. Relative...
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 30 November 2013
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.uhcf3.t53630189
EISBN: 978-1-62708-270-9
... cavities, or pits, in either of two surfaces that contact each other primarily by rolling and/or sliding action, or—in the case of cavitation pitting fatigue—in a metal surface subjected to extreme pressure in contact with a liquid. The cavities themselves are serious because they frequently act...