1-20 of 606 Search Results for

retained austenite

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Book Chapter

Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 1999
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.cmp.t66770077
EISBN: 978-1-62708-337-9
... Abstract This chapter addresses the issue of retained austenite in quenched carburized steels. It explains why retained austenite can be expected at the surface of case-hardened components, how to estimate the amount that will be present, and how to effectively stabilize or otherwise control...
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 10.31 Martensite microstructure with retained austenite (light areas). Source: Ref 4 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 11.23 Transformation of retained austenite in 4130 and 4340 steels. Source: Ref 10 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 13.6 Dual-phase steel. Ferrite and some martensite areas with retained austenite. Etchant: nital 4% followed picral 4%. Courtesy of ArcelorMittal Tubarão, ES, Brazil. More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 15.11 Carbon content of the retained austenite as a function of the austempering holding time, determined using x-ray diffraction measurements. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1998
Fig. 8-14 Hardness and retained austenite as a function of tempering temperature in a high-carbon L-type tool steel. Source: Ref 18 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1998
Fig. 11-5 Retained austenite as a function of austenitizing temperature for air-cooled A6 tool steel and A2 steel cooled in different media. Source: Ref 5 , 6 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1998
Fig. 11-9 Transformation curves for retained austenite in an air-hardening A2 tool steel containing 1.00% C, 0.61% Mn, 0.17% Si, 5.31% Cr, 0.27% V, and 1.13% Mo, air cooled from 980 °C (1800 °F). Source: Ref 5 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1998
Fig. 12-7 Retained austenite in hardened microstructures of D2 tool steel as a function of austenitizing temperature for hardening and cooling media. Source: Ref 12 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1998
Fig. 14-33 Relationships among tempering parameter, hardness, retained austenite, and M s and M, temperatures of retained austenite in M2 high-speed steel. Source: Ref 33 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1998
Fig. 4-21 Plate martensite in A2 tool steel. Retained austenite is present between the nonparallel plates of martensite. Source: Ref 28 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1998
Fig. 5-38 Hardness and retained austenite as a function of tempering in A2 tool steel. Source: Ref 74 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1996
Fig. 5-54 Transmission electron micrographs showing retained austenite stringers between the martensite laths. (From J.P Materkowski and G. Krauss, Met. Trans ., Vol 10A, p 1643 (1979), Ref 25 ) More
Image
Published: 01 December 1996
Fig. 9-21 The amount of retained austenite upon quenching to 25°C as a function of carbon content of the austenite. Also shown is the M s temperature. (Adapted from G.R. Speich and W.C. Leslie, Met. Trans ., Vol 3, p 1043 (1972), Ref 14 ) More
Image
Published: 01 December 1996
Fig. 9-23 The amount of retained austenite as a function of the martensite start temperature M s and the temperature T q to which the steel is quenched. (From D.P. Koistinen and R.E. Marburger, Acta Metallurgica , Vol 7, p 59-60 (1959), Ref 23 ) More
Image
Published: 01 January 2022
Fig. 10.9 Relationships among retained austenite, austempering time, and temperature. Source: Ref 2 . Courtesy of Dr. R.A. Harding, Kovove Materialy More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 2.11 Martensite microstructure (needle-shaped grains) and retained austenite (white matrix). Source: Ref 2.1 More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Fig. 18 Residual-stress distribution and retained austenite content in case-hardened steels More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Fig. 20 Effect of retained austenite on impact fatigue resistance of a carburized 1.45C-11.5Cr steel More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Fig. 21 Effect of retained austenite (RA) on abrasive wear. Sample A, HRC = 59.7±1.8, RA = 37; sample B, HRC = 62.7±1.2, RA = 6%; and sample C, HRC = 61.4±1.5, RA = 23% More