1-20 of 399 Search Results for

purity

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 2000
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.ttg2.t61120144
EISBN: 978-1-62708-269-3
... Abstract This appendix provides datasheets on high purity titanium, describing its processing characteristics, mechanical and fabrication properties, and heat treating practices. high purity titanium ...
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 4.1 (Part 1) High-purity irons. (a) to (d) NPL-BISRA high-purity hot-rolled iron bar. 0.0026C-0.003Si-0.004Mn-0.0016O-0.0018N (wt%). (a) 76 HV. 1% nital. 100×. (b) 76 HV. Picral. 2000×. (c) 76 HV. 3% nital. 250×. (d) Annealed from 925 °C. 72 HV. Picral. 2000×. (e) to (h More
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 27.7 Effect of purity on corrosion resistance of AZ91 alloy. Source: Ref 6 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2015
Fig. 10 Effect of relative humidity on fretting damage to high-purity iron tested in air. (a) Dry air. (b) 10% relative humidity. (c) 35% relative humidity. (d) Saturated air. All specimens shown after 3 × 10 5 cycles. See also Fig. 11 . Courtesy of R.C. Bill, NASA Lewis Research Center More
Image
Published: 01 December 2015
Fig. 11 Effect of relative humidity on fretting damage to high-purity nickel. Damage produced after 3 × 10 5 cycles in (a) dry air and (b) saturated air. See also Fig. 10 . Courtesy of R.C. Bill, NASA Lewis Research Center More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 6.4 Effects of average plant water purity shown in field correlations of the core-component cracking behavior for (a) stainless steel IRM/SRM instrumentation dry tubes, and (b) creviced stainless steel safe ends (C) creviced Inconel 600 shroud-head bolts, also showing the predicted More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 6.13 Comparison of D-STEM analysis data ( Ref 6.45 ) from commercial-purity type 348 and high-purity type 348 stainless steels irradiated to various fluences in a BWR. These data generally agree with the AES data in Fig. 6.12 on the identical materials. Source: Ref 6.1 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 13.24 Effect of alloy purity on fracture toughness of aluminum alloys. Source: Ref 12 More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 9.18 (Part 3) (i) Variation in M s temperature with carbon content of high-purity iron-carbon alloys. The regimes of the lath and plate morphologies of martensite are also indicated. After Ref 20 . More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 12.1 (Part 2) (e) and (f) 0.1% high-purity alloy (0.11C-0.0006Si-0.0009Mn, wt%). (e) Oxidized at 550 °C for 95 h (annealed surface). Picral. 500×. (f) Oxidized at 550 °C for 95 h (abraded surface). Picral. 500×. (g) and (h) 0.5% C high-purity alloy (0.50C-0.004Si-0.0009Mn, wt More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 12.4 (Part 1) Oxide scale formed at 700 °C. High-purity 1%C (0.99C-0.003Si-0.0005Mn, wt%). Austenitized at 950 °C, cooled slowly, oxidized at 700 °C in pure dry oxygen for (magnification shown in parentheses): (a) 2 min (2000×). (b) 1 h (750×). (c) 20 h (500×), and (d) 20 h (500×). More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 12.4 (Part 2) Oxide scale formed at 700 °C. High-purity 1% C (0.99C-0.003Si-0.0005Mn, wt%). Austenitized at 950 °C, cooled slowly, oxidized at 700 °C in pure dry oxygen for (magnification shown in parentheses): (a) 2 min (2000×). (b) 1 h (750×). (c) 20 h (500×), and (d) 20 h (500×). More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 2.39 SEM fractographs of the tensile test fracture surface of a high-purity, coarse-grained Al-4.2Cu alloy with (a) intergranular facets at low magnification (10×) and (b) uniform dimples on one facet at higher magnification (67×). The microstructure indicated alloy depletion at the grain More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. A7.1 Comparison of regular and high-purity (lower iron and silicon contents) versions of alloys 2024 and 7075. Plane-strain fracture toughness is higher in the high-purity alloys (designated as 2124 and 7475). Source: Ref A7.2 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2007
Fig. 3.66 Cyclic oxidation resistance of the normal purity Ni-20Cr-12Al (30 to 40 ppm S), the high-purity Ni-20Cr-12Al (1 to 2 ppm S) and the normal purity Ni-20Cr-12Al-Y at 1180 °C. Source: Ref 96 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2001
Fig. 10 Tensile properties of high-purity, wrought aluminum-copper alloys. Sheet specimen was 13 mm (0.5 in.) wide and 1.59 mm (0.0625 in.) thick. O, annealed; W, tested immediately after water quenching from a solution heat treatment; T4, as in W, but aged at room temperature; T6, as in T4 More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 4.23 Relative change in thermal resistivity of a high-purity copper (RRR = 1500) as a function of longitudinal magnetic field at low temperatures ( Sparks, 1975 ). More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 5.17 Resistivity as a function of purity as measured in the transverse configuration at several magnetic fields for aluminum and copper. More
Image
Published: 30 April 2020
Fig. 10.33 High-purity alumina is sintered with different dopants at increasing concentrations to show that densification improves with magnesia but is hindered with calcia. Source: Bae and Baik ( Ref 19 ) More
Image
Published: 01 December 1989
Fig. 8.27. Results of stress-rupture tests of superclean and conventional-purity LP rotor forgings ( Ref 81 ). More