1-20 of 544 Search Results for

plane-strain

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 February 2005
Fig. 9.7 Analysis of plane strain upsetting by the FE method. (a) Part for plane strain upsetting. (b) Full model. (c) Quarter model More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 4.9 Plane stress and plane strain elements near the crack tip More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 4.32 Effect of temperature and strain rate on plane-strain fracture toughness behavior of ASTM type A36 steel. Source: Ref 4.36 More
Image
Published: 30 November 2013
Fig. 11 Specimen types used in plane-strain fracture-toughness ( K Ic ) testing (ASTMA 399). a , crack length; W , specimen width More
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 13.20 Typical load-displacement curves for plane-strain fracture toughness test. Source: Ref 10 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2001
Fig. 1 Plane-strain fracture toughness of maraging steels compared with fracture toughness of several ultrahigh strength steels as a function of tensile strength. More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 8.23 Plane-strain fracture toughness, K Ic , versus tensile yield strength for selected aluminum alloy castings. SC, sand cast alloy; PE, premium engineered alloy More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 8.24 Plane-strain fracture toughness, K Ic , versus notch-yield ratio for some cast aluminum alloys compared to the mean values of the relationship for wrought aluminum alloys More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 8.25 Plane-strain fracture toughness, K Ic , versus notch-yield ratio for selected cast aluminum alloys compared to the range of such values for wrought aluminum alloys. SC, sand cast; PM, permanent mold More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. A3.7 Compact tension plane strain fracture toughness specimen. Refer to ASTM E 399. More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 3 Effect of thickness and n value on the plane-strain intercept of a forming limit diagram. Source: Ref 8 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 10 Plane-strain tensile test specimen. Source: Ref 33 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 12 h 1 versus 1/ n for a center-cracked panel in tension under plane strain. Source: Ref 6 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 30 Correlation of plane-strain impact fracture toughness and impact Charpy V-notch energy absorption for various grades of steel. Source: Ref 3 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 31 Correlation of plane-strain impact fracture toughness and impact Charpy V-notch energy absorption for SA 533B, class 1, steel. NDT, nil-ductility transition. Source: Ref 3 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 32 Relation between plane-strain fracture toughness ( K Ic ) and Charpy V-notch (CVN) impact energy. Tests conducted at 27 °C (80 °F). VM, vacuum melted; AM, air melted. Source: Ref 3 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 26 Relationships of plane-strain fracture toughness to yield strength for the 2 xxx and 7 xxx series of aluminum alloys. Source: Ref 12 More
Image
Published: 01 February 2005
Fig. 9.1 Changes in shape during upsetting. Plane strain (initial width ℓ o and initial height h o ) and axisymmetric (initial radius R o ) More
Image
Published: 01 February 2005
Fig. 9.2 Equilibrium of forces in plane strain homogeneous upsetting More
Image
Published: 30 September 2023
Figure 2.2: Plane-strain condition created by the restraint imposed (a) by a die and (b) by a non-deforming portion of the workpiece. More