Fig. 3.3 Alloying elements used in nickel-base superalloys. Beneficial minor elements are marked with cross-hatch, while detrimental tramp elements are marked with horizontal line hatch. More

Fig. 3.7 Carbides in microstructures of nickel-base superalloys. (a) Fully heat treated and operated B-1900 showing MC (arrows A) and M 6 C (arrows B) carbides, (b) fully heat treated Waspaloy showing globular M 23 C 6 carbides in grain boundary, (c) Waspaloy showing MC film in grain boundary More

Fig. 9.7 Aging curves showing hardness vs. time for selected nickel-base superalloys. Note the slow initial kinetics for IN-718. More

Fig. 12.30 1000 h rupture strength of selected wrought nickel-base superalloys vs. temperature More

Fig. 12.52 100 h rupture strength of selected PC cast nickel-base superalloys vs. temperature More

Fig. 12.78 Comparison of the rupture ductilities of several nickel-base superalloys in CGDS and PC cast conditions. More

Fig. 13.5 Oxidation resistance of Nimonic nickel-base superalloys during continuous heating of foil for 100 h in air. Weight change determined after oxide descaling More

Fig. 15.2 Temperature-strength capability of selected nickel-base superalloys as a function of year of availability (about 1950–1990) More

Fig. 15.4 Temperature-strength capability of selected nickel-base superalloys as a function of year of availability (about 1942–1980). Temperature determined for 1000 h life at 150 MPa (21.8 ksi). Note: This figure is not from same data sources as Fig. 15.1 – 15.3 . More

Fig. 8.1 Application of the 10% rule to test data on the nickel-base superalloys IN-100, Mar-M 200, and B-1900. Source: Ref 8.12 More

Fig. 5.1 Alloying elements in nickel-base superalloys. Beneficial minor elements are indicated by cross-hatching, while detrimental tramp elements are marked with horizontal lines. Source: Ref 1 More

Fig. 3 Alloying elements used in nickel-base superalloys. The height of the element blocks indicates the amount that may be present. Beneficial trace elements are marked with cross hatching and harmful trace elements are marked with horizontal line hatching. More

Fig. 20.13 Yield strengths of some wrought nickel-base superalloys, with H-11 being included for comparison [ International Nickel Co., 1977 ] More

Fig. 20.14 Yield strengths of several cast and wrought nickel-base superalloys [ International Nickel Co., 1977 , and Simmons, 1971 ] More

Fig. 6.1 Radial forge processing of nickel-base superalloy into round billet. Courtesy of Allvac ATI More

Fig. 5.4 (a) X-ray diffractograms comparing IN625 (nickel-base superalloy) powders and cold-sprayed IN625 coating reveal broadening of the diffraction peaks in the coating, indicative of macroscopic strain. (b) Hall-Williamson plot taken from the peak broadening data to calculate the extent More

Fig. 4.1 Freckles in IN-718 nickel-base superalloy billet forged from vacuum arc remelted ingot in which control of melt conditions was lost. Note: Composition of freckle vs. matrix was by microprobe and does not show carbon, which would be elevated in the freckles. Compositions More

Fig. 4.2 IN-718 nickel-base superalloy showing (a) pseudobinary phase diagram for niobium, (b) dendritic ingot structure produced by vacuum arc remelting (VAR), and (c) niobium distribution in trace perpendicular to dendrite More

Fig. 4.17 Transverse billet section of IN-718 nickel-base superalloy macroetched to show VAR shelf location and depth at billet surface More

Fig. 4.19 Transverse billet section of IN-718 nickel-base superalloy showing niobium distribution in homogenized and forged product (a) heat treated to maximize delta precipitation and macroetched, showing lack of contrast in section, and (b) same section heat treated to exceed the local More