This appendix is a compilation of suggested analysis methods for suspected component failure causes.

This chapter describes an investigation following an aircraft accident in which the main undercarriage struts had failed. Visual examination revealed that the starboard strut fractured about 13 cm from the end nearest the underside of the wing. A close-up view of the fracture surface indicated that cracking initiated at the outer periphery of the strut and propagated inward until overload fracture occurred. SEM imaging revealed fatigue striations along the outer periphery and dimples elsewhere, indicative of tensile overload. Based on these observations, investigators concluded that the starboard strut failed by fatigue, which overloaded the port side strut as evidenced by its slant type fracture pattern.

This chapter discusses field, visual, physical, and metallurgical examinations of gear failures. Physical examinations reviewed include nondestructive testing, including magnetic-particle inspection, tooth characteristic studies, surface hardness testing, ultrasonic testing, nital etching, profilometer measurements, and dimensional checking. Metallurgical examinations reviewed include the cross-sectional hardness survey, macroscopic examination, carbon gradient traverse, chemical analysis, case hardness traverse [microhardness], microscopic examination, and scanning electron microscopy.

This chapter discusses the techniques applicable to the diagnosis of corrosion failures, including visual and microscopic examination of corroded surfaces and microstructure; chemical analysis of the metal, corrosion products, and bulk environment; nondestructive evaluation methods; corrosion testing techniques; and mechanical testing techniques. A guide to investigative techniques used in corrosion failure analysis is provided in a table, describing the advantages and limitations of each technique. The principal stages of the investigation and analysis of corrosion failures discussed in the chapter are: collection of background information and sampling; preliminary laboratory examination; detailed metallographic and fractographic examinations; chemical analysis of corrosion products and bulk materials; corrosion testing for quality control; mechanical testing for quality control; and analysis of results and report writing.

Visual inspection is the most important method of inspection of materials. This chapter describes the procedures involved in visual inspection such as identification markings, identification of defects caused by heating problems, scaling of materials, cracking characterization, and measurement of material dimensions. It discusses the mechanisms, advantages, limitations, components, and applications of various visual inspection tools, namely magnifying devices, lighting for visual inspection, measuring devices, miscellaneous measuring equipment, record-keeping devices, and macroetching.

A first-stage compressor blade failed prematurely in an aircraft engine, fracturing at the midpoint of the root transition region. An examination of the fracture surface revealed beach marks, striations, and pitting, indicating that the blade failed by fatigue due to a crack initiated by corrosion pits in the root transition region. The chapter recommends further investigations to determine the cause of pitting, which appears to be confined to the dovetail region.

During cyclic spin tests, the turbine disc in an aircraft engine broke apart with a loud noise, followed by a fire. Based on a detailed examination and the results of SEM fractography and hardness measurements, failure analysts concluded that a locking plate became dislodged due to the shearing of the screws that hold it in place. They also provided recommendations to remediate the problem.

This chapter describes an investigation that was conducted to determine why quill shafts were failing prematurely in gear boxes on aircraft engines. The investigation focused on the splines in a splined bore. Visual examination showed that the splines were heavily worn and covered with red powder on one end. Investigators also observed blueing, an effect of overheating. Based on these observations and the results of SEM imaging, it was concluded that the splines in the spline bore were wearing out for lack of lubrication.

The aluminum alloy skin on the main rotor blade of a helicopter tore off in flight, and an investigation was subsequently conducted to find the cause. Visual examination and SEM fractography revealed that a fatigue crack originated on the underside of a rivet hole at the trailing edge of the blade. The crack then propagated through the outer skin toward the leading edge of the blade. Once the fatigue crack reached critical length, the sheet metal fractured catastrophically, tearing away from the blade.

This chapter discusses the failure of an aircraft control cable and the investigation that followed. It explains how visual examination showed that the failure occurred in a heavily worn section that runs over a pulley. Further examination under a stereoscope and in a SEM found that 40 out of 49 wires had thinned and broke apart, and that the remaining nine wires failed in tension evidenced by cup and cone fracture and the presence of dimples on the fracture surface. Based on their findings, investigators concluded that cable snapped because of excessive thinning due to contact wear.

A compressor blade made of titanium alloy fractured during an engine test. The material and processing conditions of the blade were found to be satisfactory, turning the focus of the investigation to operating anomalies and human error. A photograph of the failed blade shows well-defined chevron marks along the fracture surface that end in a shear lip on the convex side. Further examination using a SEM shows that the failure was due to overload. Based on these observations and the results of tensile testing and microstructural analysis, investigators concluded that a sudden impact load on the concave side of the blade caused it to fracture.

This chapter discusses the failure of a control cable on an aircraft and the findings of an investigation that followed. The cable was made of stranded steel wire that was visibly worn. All seven strands had snapped and bore evidence of corrosion, pitting, nicks, and rubbing. Based on their observations and the results of SEM fractography, investigators concluded that tensile overload was the predominate cause of failure.

This chapter explains how to take the known facts of a specific failure, place them in a systematic context to arrive at a logical conclusion, and point to a corrective measure. It presents example examinations to describe a systematic approach to failure examination.

A cardon shaft operating in an aircraft engine failed and was taken out and analyzed to determine the cause. A photograph of the broken shaft in the as-received condition shows the location and orientation of the fracture. The fracture surface appeared smooth, indicating that a considerable amount of rubbing occurred after the shaft broke. SEM fractography revealed deformation marks and elongated dimples, typical of shear overloads, along with other details. Based on their analysis, investigators concluded that the cardan shaft failed under torsional overload. They also cited a need for a more detailed examination of the driven end of the shaft.

This chapter discusses the basic steps of a failure investigation. It explains that the first step is to gather and document information about the failed component and its operating history. It advises investigators to visit the failure site as soon as possible to record damages and collect test specimens for subsequent examination and chemical analysis. It also discusses the role of mechanical property testing, the use of nondestructive evaluation, and the final step of generating a report.

A low-pressure turbine rotor blade failed during a test run, causing extensive damage to an aircraft engine. Visual examination showed that the nickel-base superalloy blade broke above the root platform in the airfoil section, leaving a fracture surface with two distinct regions, one characteristic of fatigue, the other, overload. Two dents were also visible on the leading edge, near the origin of the fracture. Based on these observations and the results of SEM fractography, investigators concluded that the blade failed due to fatigue aided by cracks in the surface coating caused by mechanical damage.

After several failed attempts to lower their starboard wheels for landing, pilots engaged the help of gravity through g-force maneuvers and managed to coax the wheels into place. An inspection following the incident revealed a broken universal joint in one of the linkages that opens and closes the doors to the undercarriage compartment. The failed component was removed from the aircraft and examined using optical and electron microscopes. Under low magnification, the fracture surface appeared jagged except for one corner that was relatively smooth. SEM fractography revealed the presence of fatigue striations in the smooth region and dimpling elsewhere. Based on their findings, investigators concluded that fatigue loading initiated a crack in the universal joint that progressed with time and that the final fracture occurred due to bending tensile overload.

A tie rod on a 70-ton aircraft towing tractor failed during a test run, fracturing near a welded bracket that connects to a hydraulic jack. This chapter discusses the failure and the investigation that followed. It presents a close-up view of the fracture surface showing what appears to be a brittle fracture that initiated from a zone of poor-quality weld. It also provides photographic evidence of a weld crack in the heat-affected zone and includes a drawing of a modified weld design that passed subsequent testing.

A turbine blade in an aircraft engine failed, fracturing at the root above the fir tree region. Fractography indicated that a fatigue crack initiated at the trailing edge of the blade and the final fracture occurred when the crack reached critical length. Although the exact cause of crack initiation could not be established, material defects, improper root loading, and high operating temperatures were ruled out. This chapter describes how investigators came to their conclusions and what they learned through visual and SEM examination and qualitative elemental analysis. It includes images of the microstructure and fracture surfaces and explains what some of the details reveal about the failure.

A second-stage turbine blade in an aircraft engine failed in service, fracturing along a path through the shroud hole. Cracks were also found in the shroud holes of the two adjacent blades. Based on the results of visual examination and SEM fractography, investigators concluded that the fracture and cracks were due to the fretting action of the pins inside the shroud holes.