1-20 of 772 Search Results for

impact test

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 September 2005
Fig. 8 Test area of an impact test tower More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 6.13 Comparison between standard impact test results and results from a test piece designed to simulate a gear tooth. En 19,705M40 (nominally, 0.40 C, 1.0 Cr, 0.3 Mo); En 36,832M13 (nominally, 0.13 C, 3.2 Ni, 1.0 Cr, 0.15 Mo); En 30,835M30 (nominally, 0.30 C, 4.0 Ni, 1.2 Cr, 0.3 Mo); En More
Image
Published: 01 December 2003
Fig. 16 Cate gories of impact test methods used in testing of plastics. Source: Ref 11 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2003
Fig. 7 Impact test of a polycarbonate box section More
Image
Published: 01 December 2003
Fig. 6 Impact test methods exhibiting various states of stress (σ). (a) Tensile test—uniaxial stress state. (b) Dynatup test—biaxial stress state. (c) Notch Izod test—triaxial stress state. (d) Competing failure modes More
Image
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 17 Three Charpy V-notch impact test specimens of the same metallurgical conditions tested at three different temperatures. At the highest temperature (left), the fracture is virtually all shear. At intermediate temperature (center), the fracture is combined shear and cleavage More
Image
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 19 Load-time curve for instrumented Charpy impact test. Source: Ref 10 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 14.6 Absorbed energy in impact test of the steels presented in Fig. 14.5 . The effect of controlled thermomechanical treatment is evident. Source: Ref 8 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 5 Schematic of gas-gun-launched flyer plate impact test setup More
Image
Published: 01 September 2005
Fig. 9 Load deflection trace from single-tooth impact test More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 4.21 Impact test on brazed T-joints, clearly demonstrating the role of fillets in enhancing joint strength. Substrate: mild steel. Braze: Ag-Cu-Cd-Zn More
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 13.11 Load-time curve for instrumented charpy impact test. Source: Ref 7 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2007
Fig. 5.8 Schematic diagram of the Charpy impact test More
Image
Published: 30 November 2013
Fig. 11 Three Charpy V-notch impact test specimens of the same metallurgical conditions tested at three different temperatures. At the highest temperature (left), the fracture is virtually all shear. At intermediate temperature (center), the fracture is combined shear and cleavage More
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Fig. 13.15 Compression after impact test More
Image
Published: 30 April 2024
Fig. 9.16 Geometry of notched-bar impact test specimens. Simple beam Charpy specimens: (a) V-notch, (b) keyhole-notch, and (c) cantilever beam notched Izod. Source: Ref 1 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1995
Fig. 17-18 An impact test being performed More
Image
Published: 01 December 1995
Fig. 18-14 Impact test exemption curves More
Image
Published: 01 December 1995
Fig. 18-15 Charpy V-notch impact test results for ABS Class C steel ( 7 ) Curve 1 - Energy absorbed Curve 2 - Lateral expansion Curve 3 - Fracture appearance More
Image
Published: 01 December 1995
Fig. 18-26 Charpy v-notch impact test requirements for full size and specimens for carbon and low alloy steels ( 11 ) More