1-20 of 634 Search Results for

impact energy

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 8.33 Effect of impact energy on damage size. Source: Ref 8.40 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 8.34 Effect of impact energy on dent depth. Source: Ref 8.40 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Fig. 18.10 Impact energy cutoff diagram. Source: Ref 4 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2007
Fig. 10.4 Dependence of notched impact energy on tempering temperature for 0.4 and 0.5% C steels. TME, tempered martensite embrittlement. Source: Ref 10.2 More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Fig. 19 Influence of phosphorus and antimony on room-temperature impact energy as a function of tempering temperature in a Ni-Cr-Mo steel. Arrow shows the laboratory alloy. Source: Ref 19 More
Image
Published: 01 March 2012
Fig. 15.38 Impact energy absorbed as a function of isothermal transformation temperature for specimens of 4340 steel. E 0 , total energy absorbed; E 1 , fracture initiation energy; E 2 , fracture propagation energy. Source: Ref 15.24 as published in Ref 15.19 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 6.14 Impact energy absorbed as a function of isothermal transformation temperature for specimens of 4340 steel. E 0 is total energy absorbed, E 1 is fracture initiation energy, and E 2 is fracture propagation energy. Source: Ref 6.16 More
Image
Published: 01 October 2011
Fig. 8.7 Variation in Charpy V-notch impact energy with temperature for normalized plain carbon steels of varying carbon content More
Image
Published: 01 October 2011
Fig. 8.8 Variation in Charpy V-notch impact energy with microstructure and carbon content for 0.70Cr-0.32Mo steel. Carbon content levels: (a) 0.17% and (b) 0.40%. A pearlitic structure was formed by transformation at 650 °C (1200 °F). A structure with 50% martensite was formed by quenching More
Image
Published: 01 October 2011
Fig. 17.10 Variation in Charpy V-notch impact energy with temperature for furnace-cooled Fe-Mn-0.05C alloys containing varying amounts of manganese More
Image
Published: 01 October 2011
Fig. 17.11 Variation in Charpy V-notch impact energy with temperature for low-carbon steels containing varying amounts of niobium that were normalized from 955 °C (1750 °F) More
Image
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 31 Impact energy cut-off diagram. Source: Ref 17 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 1.26 Variations of (a) unnotched impact energy and (b) bending strength (15 × 60 × 2 mm). A: vacuum-carburized, 1040 °C, reheat quenched. B: vacuum-carburized, 1040 °C, direct quenched. C: vacuum carburized, 930 °C, reheat quenched. D3: gas-carburized, 920 °C, direct quenched. Source More
Image
Published: 01 December 2000
Fig. 12.3 Effects of hydrogen content and heat treatment on the impact energy of alpha titanium More
Image
Published: 01 December 2000
Fig. 12.4 Effects of hydrogen content and heat treatment on the impact energy of commercial purity titanium More
Image
Published: 01 January 1998
Fig. 7-16 Torsion impact energy absorbed as a function of tempering temperature for 1% C tool steel austenitized at various temperatures as shown. Source: Ref 19 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1998
Fig. 8-16 Torsional impact energy absorbed as a function of tempering temperature for high-carbon L-type steels. Curve 1, Bethlehem Steel Co.; curves 2 and 3, Ref 21 Curve Composition, % Hardening temperature Hardening medium C Cr V °C °F 1 0.70 0.80 0.20 800 1475 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1998
Fig. 8-25 Notched Izod impact energy absorbed versus tempered hardness for medium-carbon L2 steels. Curve 1, Ref 25 ; curve 2, Allegheny Ludlum Industries; curve 3, Teledyne VASCO Curve Composition, % Hardening temperature Hardening medium C Mn Cr Mo V °C °F 1 0.50 More
Image
Published: 01 January 1998
Fig. 8-32 Effect of tempering temperature on impact energy absorbed by L6-type steels. Curve 1, torsion impact, Ref 27 ; curve 2, unnotched Izod impact test, Allegheny Ludlum Industries; curve 3, unnotched, Bethlehem Steel Co. Curve Composition, % Hardening temperature Hardening More
Image
Published: 01 January 1998
Fig. 9-10 Impact energy absorbed as a function of tempering temperature during unnotched Charpy and torsion impact testing of S1 steel specimens. Data from Bethlehem Steel Co. Curve Test Composition, % Quenching temperature Quenching medium C Si W Cr V °C °F 1 More