Fig. 14.6 Absorbed energy in impact test of the steels presented in Fig. 14.5 . The effect of controlled thermomechanical treatment is evident. Source: Ref 8 More

Fig. 6.14 Impact energy absorbed as a function of isothermal transformation temperature for specimens of 4340 steel. E 0 is total energy absorbed, E 1 is fracture initiation energy, and E 2 is fracture propagation energy. Source: Ref 6.16 More

Fig. 14.16 Room temperature energy absorbed during CVN impact testing as a function of steel carbon content for plain carbon steels and steels microalloyed with V and V plus Nb. Source: Ref 14.20 More

Fig. 15.38 Impact energy absorbed as a function of isothermal transformation temperature for specimens of 4340 steel. E 0 , total energy absorbed; E 1 , fracture initiation energy; E 2 , fracture propagation energy. Source: Ref 15.24 as published in Ref 15.19 More

Fig. 7-16 Torsion impact energy absorbed as a function of tempering temperature for 1% C tool steel austenitized at various temperatures as shown. Source: Ref 19 More

Fig. 8-16 Torsional impact energy absorbed as a function of tempering temperature for high-carbon L-type steels. Curve 1, Bethlehem Steel Co.; curves 2 and 3, Ref 21 Curve Composition, % Hardening temperature Hardening medium C Cr V °C °F 1 0.70 0.80 0.20 800 1475 More

Fig. 8-25 Notched Izod impact energy absorbed versus tempered hardness for medium-carbon L2 steels. Curve 1, Ref 25 ; curve 2, Allegheny Ludlum Industries; curve 3, Teledyne VASCO Curve Composition, % Hardening temperature Hardening medium C Mn Cr Mo V °C °F 1 0.50 More

Fig. 8-32 Effect of tempering temperature on impact energy absorbed by L6-type steels. Curve 1, torsion impact, Ref 27 ; curve 2, unnotched Izod impact test, Allegheny Ludlum Industries; curve 3, unnotched, Bethlehem Steel Co. Curve Composition, % Hardening temperature Hardening More

Fig. 9-10 Impact energy absorbed as a function of tempering temperature during unnotched Charpy and torsion impact testing of S1 steel specimens. Data from Bethlehem Steel Co. Curve Test Composition, % Quenching temperature Quenching medium C Si W Cr V °C °F 1 More

Fig. 9-11 Impact energy absorbed as a function of tempering temperature during notched Izod testing of S1 steel specimens. Curves 1 and 4, Allegheny Ludlum Industries; curve 2, Teledyne Firth Sterling; curve 3, Crucible Steel Co. Curve Composition, % Quenching temperature Quenching More

Fig. 9-12 Effect of testing temperature on impact energy absorbed during Charpy testing of S1 steels hardened from 950 °C (1740 °F), oil quenched, and tempered at 400 °C (750 °F). Source: Ref 10 Curve Composition, % C Si Mn W Cr Mo V 1 0.51 0.26 0.39 2.15 1.43 More

Fig. 9-28 Impact energy absorbed during unnotched Charpy testing of S-type silicon tool steels. Data from Bethlehem Steel Co. Curve Composition, % Quenching temperature Quenching medium C Si Mn Mo °C °F 1 0.55 2.30 0.80 0.50 870 1600 Oil 2 0.63 1.95 0.78 More

Fig. 9-29 Impact energy absorbed during torsion testing of S-type silicon tool steels subjected to various austenitizing and quenching treatments. Curves 1 to 3, Bethlehem Steel Co.; curve 4, Ref 14 Curve Composition, % Quenching temperature Quenching medium C Si Mo V °C °F More

Fig. 9-30 Hardness and notched Izod impact energy absorbed as a function of tempering temperature for S5 tool steels with two levels of carbon content. Data from Allegheny Ludlum Industries Curve Composition, % Quenching temperature Quenching medium C Mn Si Cr Mo V °C °F More

Fig. 12-14 Torsional impact energy absorbed by D2 and D3 tool steel specimens as a function of tempering temperature. Absolute magnitudes of impact energy are not comparable because of testing variations. Curve for D2, Bethlehem Steel Co.; curve for D3, Ref 22 Type Conmposition More

Fig. 12-18 Unnotched Charpy impact energy absorbed by hardened high-carbon, high-chromium tool steel specimens (0.85% C, 11.50% Cr, 1.00% Ni, 0.45% Mo, and 0.30% V) as a function of tempering temperature. Data from Bethlehem Steel Co. More

Fig. 4.8 (a) Safety zone to protect occupant. (b) Crushing zone to absorb crash impact energy. Source: Ref 4.7 More

Figure 7.16 Temperature dependence of energy absorbed and lateral expansion in Charpy impact toughness test for A-533-B steel ( Gross, 1970 ). More

Fig. 18-15 Charpy V-notch impact test results for ABS Class C steel ( 7 ) Curve 1 - Energy absorbed Curve 2 - Lateral expansion Curve 3 - Fracture appearance More

Fig. 11.5 Schematic diagram comparing energy absorbed as a function of temperature during high-rate impact testing and slow bend testing of notched specimens. CVN, Charpy V-notch; DBTT, ductile-brittle transition temperature. Source: Ref 11.11 More