Search Results for heat transfer

Fig. 6.19 (a) Heat transfer between the die and injected metal, (b) metal flow analysis More

Fig. 1 Polishing of heat-transfer tubes from erosion by sand in a fluidized-bed combustor More

Fig. 2 Carbon steel heat-transfer tube from a fluidized bed that was damaged by erosion and subsequent rusting More

Fig. 14 Comparison of the heat-transfer coefficients achievable with different gas-quenching media for bulk-loading and single-component quenching Source: Ref 18 More

Fig. 22.8 Heat-transfer coefficient and temperature changes in a typical hot forging operation (A, heated billet resting on lower die; B, contact time under pressure; C, forging removed from lower die; D, lubrication of die; E, dwell time with no billet on lower die before next cycle begins More

Fig. 3.16 Heat-transfer coefficient as a function of pressure. Source: Ref 3.23 More

Fig. 5.35 Comparison of punch load predictions using various heat-transfer coefficients (HTC = kW/m 2 • °C) with experiments (5 mm/s at 250 °C). LDR, limiting draw ratio. Source: Ref 5.31 More

Fig. 5.36 Predicted thickness distribution comparison with various heat-transfer coefficients (HTC) (5 mm/s at 250 °C). LDR, limiting draw ratio. Source: Ref 5.31 More

Fig. 7.15 Experimental setup for finding heat-transfer coefficient. Source: Ref 7.13 More

Fig. 7.16 Heat-transfer coefficient as a function of pressure for both-sided metallic contact. Source: Ref 7.11 More

Fig. 7.17 Contact heat-transfer coefficient as a function of contact pressure and distance between tool and sheet material surface. Source: Ref 7.14 More

Fig. 7.20 Contact heat transfer from the blank to the tool. Source: Ref 7.23 More

Fig. 6.8 Setup used in the ring test for the measurement of interface heat transfer coefficient. [ Burte et al., 1989 ] More

Fig. 6-11 Plot of surface-to-center temperature ratio vs. the heat-transfer coefficient, h , to show the effect of varying tool steel slug diameters ranging from 25 to 250 mm (1 to 10 in.). Source: Ref 4 More

Fig. 6-12 Plot of cooling rate at the center of the slug vs. the heat-transfer coefficient, h , of M2 tool steel to show the effect of varying diameters over the temperature range of 1200 to 600 °C (2190 to 1110 °F). Source: Ref 4 More

Fig. 6-14 Heat-transfer coefficient, h , rises with the increase in velocity of the fluidized bed until a peak value, h max, is reached at the optimum velocity, V opt . Source: Ref 7 More

Fig. 4-14 Heat transfer correlations between the position in cylinders and the position on the Jominy bar. (From C.F. Jatczak, Metal Progress , Vol 100, No. 3, p 60 (1971), Ref 7 ) More

Fig. 4-15 (Part 1) Heat transfer correlations between the position in cylinders and the position on the Jominy bar. (From Metals Handbook , 9th edition, Vol 1, Properties and Selection: Irons and Steels , American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio (1978), Ref 8 ) More

Fig. 4-15 (Part 2) Heat transfer correlations between the position in cylinders and the position on the Jominy bar. (From Metals Handbook , 9th edition, Vol 1, Properties and Selection: Irons and Steels , American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio (1978), Ref 8 ) Quenching medium More