1-20 of 1119

Search Results for grain boundaries

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 12.5 Because atoms at grain boundaries are in a higher energy state, the grain boundaries become anodic. More
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 2.22 Grain boundaries in equilibrium. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 18.11 Precipitation of chromium carbide at grain boundaries More
Image
Published: 01 December 1984
Figure 3-44 Prior-austenite grain boundaries in four different martensitic steels revealed with different etchants. More
Image
Published: 01 December 1984
Figure 3-45 Prior-austenite grain boundaries in a martensitic low-carbon sheet steel revealed by etching with Marshall’s reagent, 15 s, 150×. (Courtesy of A. O. Benscoter, Bethlehem Steel Corp.) More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 9 Depletion of chromium from the austenite near grain boundaries due to chromium carbide precipitation. Source: Ref 14 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2001
Fig. 2 Nature of grain boundaries More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 16.5 Crack following prior austenitic grain boundaries in AISI 410 steel subjected to corrosion testing according to NACE TM 0177 standard. Courtesy of A. Zeemann, Tecmetal, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 2.27 Grain boundaries act as barriers to slip by dislocations. Source: Ref 2.1 More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Fig. 55 Creep cavities and creep wedges forming at grain boundaries More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Fig. 59 Intergranular oxidation of the surface along prior grain boundaries in a carburized steel. Original magnification: 1000×. Source: Ref 78 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2007
Fig. 1.2 Crystal structure of the grains and the nature of the grain boundaries More
Image
Published: 01 November 2007
Fig. 4.19 Pearlite nodules (dark areas) formed on prior-austenite grain boundaries, indicated by white lines. Slow-quenched 1095 steel. Nital etch. Original magnification: 600 × More
Image
Published: 01 November 2007
Fig. 8.11 Segregation of solute atoms to grain boundaries and resultant solute drag More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 6.9 Composition profiles across grain boundaries obtained by a dedicated scanning transmission electron microscope (DSTEM) in a 20Cr-25Ni-Nb stainless steel irradiated to 2 to 5 × 10 21 n/cm 2 in a steam-generated heavy water reactor (SGHWR) at 288 °C (550 °F). Data are compared More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 6.11 Compositional profiles across grain boundaries obtained by D-STEM from a low-strain, high-purity type 348 stainless steel swelling-tube specimen irradiated to 3.4 × 10 21 n/cm 2 at 288 °C (550 °F) in a BWR. Source: Ref 6.45 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 4.17 Proeutectoid cementite (white network) formed at austenite grain boundaries in an Fe-1.22C alloy held at 780 °C (1435 °F) for 30 min. Dark patches are pearlite colonies and the remainder of the microstructure is martensite and retained austenite. Nital etch. Original magnification More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 8.4 Prior-austenite grain boundaries in the core of a carburized steel. (a) Etched and partially repolished, leaving remnants of intragranular structure. (b) Etched and repolished to remove all intragranular structure. Light micrographs; details of etching are given in the text. Source More
Image
Published: 01 March 2002
Fig. 8.28 Prior austenite grain boundaries in a quenched 0.5% Mo-B steel. (a) 200× and (b) 500×. Boiling alkaline sodium picrate etch followed by 10 seconds in 2% nital etch and 20 seconds in 4% picral etch More
Image
Published: 01 March 2002
Fig. 8.29 Prior austenite grain boundaries in a quenched and tempered MIL-S-23194 composition F-steel forging. Modified Winsteard’s etch. 500× More