Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
friction coefficient
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 270 Search Results for
friction coefficient
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Image
in Dealing with Friction in Design Engineering
> Tribomaterials<subtitle>Properties and Selection for Friction, Wear, and Erosion Applications</subtitle>
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 3.15 The trend for friction coefficient measured for many metal-to-metal couples in the ASTM G98 galling test. The coefficient of friction reduces when gross plastic deformation of the rubbing surfaces takes place.
More
Image
in Dealing with Friction in Design Engineering
> Tribomaterials<subtitle>Properties and Selection for Friction, Wear, and Erosion Applications</subtitle>
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 3.20 Friction coefficient trends observed over 30 years of laboratory testing of many different tribocouples
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 7.13 Evolution of friction coefficient, μ, with different tool temperature, maintaining punch at room temperature for 22MnB5. Sheet thickness t 0 = 1.75 mm (0.069 in.); austenitization temperature T γ = 950 °C (1740 °F); austenitization time t γ = 5 min; punch velocity V punch
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 7.14 Friction coefficient, μ, as function of blank temperature in contact area at die radius at moment of maximum drawing force for 22MnB5. Sheet thickness t 0 = 1.75 mm (0.069 in.); austenitization temperature T γ = 950 °C (1740 °F); austenitization time t γ = 5 min; punch
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2003
Fig. 17 Specific wear rate and friction coefficient of unidirectional composites (see Table 4 ) in three orientations (pressure, 1.5 N/mm 2 ; velocity, 0.83 m/s; distance slid, 16 km)
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 7.11 Effect of temperature on mean friction coefficients under dry conditions. Source: Ref 7.10
More
Book Chapter
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 30 April 2021
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.tpsfwea.t59300047
EISBN: 978-1-62708-323-2
... Abstract This chapter discusses the effect of friction in the context of design. It explains how friction coefficients are determined and how they are used to make sizing and selection decisions. It covers practical issues associated with rolling friction, the use of lubricants...
Abstract
This chapter discusses the effect of friction in the context of design. It explains how friction coefficients are determined and how they are used to make sizing and selection decisions. It covers practical issues associated with rolling friction, the use of lubricants, and the tribology of metal, ceramic, and polymer surfaces in contact. It also discusses the nature of rolling friction and provides helpful design guidelines.
Image
in Cold Spray Coating Applications in Protection and Manufacturing
> High Pressure Cold Spray: Principles and Applications
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 7.12 (a) Coefficient of friction and (b) wear rate of Al5056 and Al5056-SiC coatings. Source: Ref 7.54
More
Image
in Dealing with Friction in Design Engineering
> Tribomaterials<subtitle>Properties and Selection for Friction, Wear, and Erosion Applications</subtitle>
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 3.2 The coefficient of friction of various web materials, thin materials that can be conveyed on rollers, versus a 4-in. diam. aluminum roller with a 0.5 μm roughness average (R a ) hardcoat finish. Test velocity was 0.1 m/s. Six replicates were conducted on a fresh surface of each
More
Image
in Dealing with Friction in Design Engineering
> Tribomaterials<subtitle>Properties and Selection for Friction, Wear, and Erosion Applications</subtitle>
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 3.16 Correlation of sole rubber hardness with coefficient of friction versus prefinished oak flooring
More
Image
in Dealing with Friction in Design Engineering
> Tribomaterials<subtitle>Properties and Selection for Friction, Wear, and Erosion Applications</subtitle>
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 3.18 Coefficient of friction of candidate bearing for a slow-moving linear slide that could tolerate no stick-slip behavior
More
Image
in Tribological Properties of Copper Alloys
> Tribomaterials<subtitle>Properties and Selection for Friction, Wear, and Erosion Applications</subtitle>
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 6.2 Effect of normal force on the coefficient of friction of copper (Cu) in continuous unlubricated sliding on type 316 stainless steel (SS)
More
Image
in Tribological Properties of Stainless Steel and Other Corrosion-Resisting Metals
> Tribomaterials<subtitle>Properties and Selection for Friction, Wear, and Erosion Applications</subtitle>
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 9.7 Coefficient of friction (μ k ) of various stainless steel couples wear tested in a thrust bearing type of contact. (e.g., Fig. 9.8 )
More
Image
in Tribological Properties of Ceramics, Cermets, and Cemented Carbides
> Tribomaterials<subtitle>Properties and Selection for Friction, Wear, and Erosion Applications</subtitle>
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 10.5 Coefficient of friction of various ceramics in block-on-ring testing, where * indicates thermal spray coatings
More
Image
in Tribological Properties of Ceramics, Cermets, and Cemented Carbides
> Tribomaterials<subtitle>Properties and Selection for Friction, Wear, and Erosion Applications</subtitle>
Published: 30 April 2021
Image
in Tribological Properties of Ceramics, Cermets, and Cemented Carbides
> Tribomaterials<subtitle>Properties and Selection for Friction, Wear, and Erosion Applications</subtitle>
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 10.22 Coefficient of friction (kinetic) of various cemented carbide couples in block-on-ring testing, where * indicates thermal spray coatings
More
Image
in Tribology of Plastics and Elastomers
> Tribomaterials<subtitle>Properties and Selection for Friction, Wear, and Erosion Applications</subtitle>
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 11.8 Ranges of coefficient of friction for plastic versus steel tribosystems (from various plastics manufacturers’ catalogs). PTFE, polytetrafluoroethylene
More
Image
in Tribology of Plastics and Elastomers
> Tribomaterials<subtitle>Properties and Selection for Friction, Wear, and Erosion Applications</subtitle>
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 11.9 Effect of normal force on the coefficient of friction (kinetic) of acetal versus 316 stainless steel
More
Image
in Tribology of Plastics and Elastomers
> Tribomaterials<subtitle>Properties and Selection for Friction, Wear, and Erosion Applications</subtitle>
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 11.10 Static coefficient of friction of various plastics versus 52100 steel (60 HRC). PE, polyethylene; PTFE; polytetrafluoroethylene; PP, polypropylene; PBT, polybutylene terephthalate; PEEK, polyetheretherketone; PA, polyamide; PET, polyethylene terephthalate; PMMA
More
Image
in Tribology of Plastics and Elastomers
> Tribomaterials<subtitle>Properties and Selection for Friction, Wear, and Erosion Applications</subtitle>
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 11.21 Breakaway coefficient of friction of 14 commercially manufactured shoes (soles) on prefinished oak flooring
More