Fig. 61 Typical fatigue behavior in an aggressive environment compared with fatigue behavior in an inert environment or at high frequency. (a) Data plotted as S - N curves. (b) Data plotted as the crack-growth rate vs. stress-intensity range. The environmental influence is most pronounced More

Fig. 8.9 Effect of shot peening on fatigue behavior More

Fig. 3.9 Fatigue behavior of steels More

Fig. 3.10 Fatigue behavior of aluminum More

Fig. 14.11 Comparison of fatigue behavior of quench and tempered steel and microalloyed steel at the same hardness. Source: Ref 14.19 More

Fig. 5.23 Comparison of fatigue behavior: parent metal, parent metal with a hole, and a welded joint. Source: Ref 5.11 More

Fig. 7.6 Cyclic fatigue behavior of nickel-base superalloy (Astroloy) as affected by reduction in maximum powder defect size More

Fig. 12.46 Low-cycle fatigue behavior of IN 738 nickel-base superalloy in vacuum, air, and hot corrosion environments at 899 °C (1650 °F) and two cycling rates More

Fig. 8.15 Fatigue behavior of unidirectional composites. RT, room temperature. Source: Ref 8.1 More

Fig. 4 Comparison of steel and aluminum fatigue behavior. Source: Ref 3 More

Fig. 53 Effect of nitriding and shot peening on fatigue behavior. Comparison between fatigue limits of crankshafts ( S - N bands) and fatigue limits of separate test bars, which are indicated by plotted points at right. Steel was 4340. Source: Ref 30 More

Fig. 19 Effect of decarburization on the fatigue behavior of a steel. Source: Ref 8 More

Fig. 13 Comparison of fatigue behavior of a welded joint and parent metal. Source: Ref 16 More

Fig. 8.10 Comparison of true fatigue behavior (shown by solid curves) as perceived by the authors in Ref 8.44 with ones (shown by dotted lines) calculated using averaged constants of A , k , and m as in variant IV More

Fig. 14.1 Fatigue behavior of unidirectional composites More

Fig. 5 Comparison of fatigue behavior of a welded joint and parent metal More

Fig. 22 Effect of residual stresses on the fatigue behavior of “nominal” and “ideal” 1.0 in. plate thickness, mild steel, non-load-carrying cruciform weldments More

Fig. 7 Relative fatigue behavior of welded joints and unwelded component (with and without stress concentrators) More

Fig. 13 Effect of temper on axial-tension fatigue behavior of 5083 butt-welded joints. Source: Ref 1 More