1-20 of 1075 Search Results for

density

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 30 April 2020
Fig. 8.12 Demonstration of how higher green density impacts sintered density. These data are for 0.5 μm alumina shaped with polyvinyl alcohol heated at 5 °C/min (9 °F/min) to 1650 °C (3000 °F) for a 10 min hold in air. The lowest green density corresponds to less than four contacts per More
Image
Published: 01 December 2003
Fig. 11 Molecular architecture of high-density (HDPE), low-density (LDPE), and linear low-density (LLDPE) polyethylenes. Source: Ref 20 More
Image
Published: 01 July 2009
Fig. 25.11 Passive current density, i pass , and corrosion current density, i corr , as a function of solution pH for S-200D beryllium. A minimum in i pass and i corr exists between a pH of 4.5 and 10.7. Source: Hill et al. 1998 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2015
Fig. 10.26 Models of power density on continuous bar heating. Power density and temperature profiles of a bar at different positions in an in-line induction heater. Source: Ref 11 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2019
Figure 7 X-ray image of packaged lead frame superimposed with current density image shows the location of short (red arrow). [7] More
Image
Published: 01 November 2019
Figure 4 Current density image from backside scanning decreasing the separation distance from 200 µm to 5 µm . Images courtesy of M. Hechtl, Infineon. More
Image
Published: 01 November 2019
Figure 5 Current density image from backside scanning decreasing the current from 1 mA to 25 µA for a 5 µm thinned down die. Images courtesy of M. Hechtl, Infineon. More
Image
Published: 01 November 2019
Figure 14 Nano-scale current density image using MR sensor of a test serpentine structure on a wafer. Metal trace width is 250 nm , while spacing is 400 nm . Current is overlaid on optical image. Higher resolution images in the insets are overlaid on SEM images. More
Image
Published: 01 November 2019
Figure 16 (Left) Magnetic image of an MCM device. (Center) Current density obtained by applying the standard inverse to the magnetic image on the left. The image has been slightly rotated to allow alignment with CAD layout shown on the right. More
Image
Published: 01 November 2019
Figure 17 Current density images of shorts in a flip-chip device at (a) the die, (b) the interconnect, and (c) the package. More
Image
Published: 01 November 2019
Figure 28 Current density images from the four acquired scans overlaid with the optical device images showing abnormal current patterns. Bright yellow current color means the current is closer to the top surface, while darker orange color means current is farther away from the surface. More
Image
Published: 01 November 2019
Figure 27 GMR-based MCI image of power supply short current density from 5 µm ultra-thin silicon surface [34] . More
Image
Published: 01 March 2006
Fig. A.28 Influence of density on and strength and stiffness of polyethylene. Source: Ref A.35 More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 6.6 Behavior of the magnetization (a) and the flux density (b) for typical hysteretic ferromagnetic materials. The dashed line is the Initial magnetization curve for virgin material. More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 13.12 Critical current density, J c , vs. magnetic field, H , for several high-field superconductors. More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 13.14 Relative critical current density vs. temperature for Nb–Ti wire. Each curve corresponds to a constant value of the magnetic field ( Hampshire, Sutton, and Taylor, 1969 ). More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 13.15 Relative critical current density vs. temperature at constant magnetic field for Nb 3 Sn wire conductors ( Iwasa and Montgomery, 1975 ). More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 13.16 Relative critical current density vs. temperature at constant magnetic field for V 3 Ga wire ( Iwasa and Montgomery, 1975 ). More
Image
Published: 01 June 1983
Figure 13.46 Relative critical current density, J c / J cm as a function of intrinsic strain, ϵ 0 , for different magnetic fields, evaluated using Eq. 13.19 and the typical set of scaling parameters for multifilamentary Nb 3 Sn shown in the figure ( Ekin, 1980a ). More
Image
Published: 01 November 2007
Fig. 13.16 Carbide density as a function of austenitizing temperature More