1-20 of 696 Search Results for

crack growth rate

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 December 2003
Fig. 14 Crack growth rate ( da / dN ) as a function of the energy release rate, J I , for a single-edge notched polycarbonate specimen with 0.33 mm (0.013 in.) thickness More
Image
Published: 01 December 2003
Fig. 15 Crack growth rate ( da / dN ) as a function of the energy release rate, J I , (tearing energy) for a rubber compound. J Ic , critical energy release rate More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 6.27 Fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) scatter band data comparing Ti-6Al-4V cast and cast plus hot isostatic pressed (HIP) material with beta-annealed ingot metallurgy material More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 8.15 Fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) scatter band data comparing Ti-6Al-4V cast and cast + hot isostatic pressed (HIP) material with beta-annealed ingot metallurgy material More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 3.17 Schematic illustration of variation of fatigue crack growth rate, da/dN , with alternating stress intensity, Δ K , in steels, showing regions of primary crack growth mechanisms More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 5.38 Fatigue crack growth rate correlation technique More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 5.42 Typical shape of a fatigue crack growth rate curve for a given R value More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 5.43 Fatigue crack growth rate data for 2024-T351 aluminum with six R -ratios More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 5.51 Effect of stress ratio on fatigue crack growth rate threshold for several aluminum alloys. Source: Ref 5.27 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 5.52 Effect of stress ratio on fatigue crack growth rate threshold for titanium alloys. Source: Ref 5.54 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 5.53 Effect of stress ratio on fatigue crack growth rate threshold for several low- to medium-strength steels. Source: Ref 5.55 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 1.18 Effect of potential on the maximum crack growth rate in sensitized type 304 stainless steel in 0.1 MNa 2 SO 4 at 250 °C (480 °F). Numbers denote K I values. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 1.20 Schematic of crack growth rate vs. temperature for intergranular SCC of type 304 stainless steel More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 1.28 Crack growth rate vs. elastic-plastic stress intensity for iron and nickel tested in 1 N H 2 SO 4 at given cathodic overpotentials (COP). (a) 2 mm (0.08 in.) thick iron and nickel. (b) 10 mm (0.4 in.) thick iron and nickel More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 1.38 Schematic of crack growth rate vs. temperature for (a) 3% Ni steel in water ( Ref 1.99 ) and (b) 4340 steel in gaseous hydrogen ( Ref 1.100 ) More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 3.25 Crack growth rate as a function of stress intensity in steels B6 and B7 compared with that of steel B2. Source: Ref 3.40 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 3.42 Effects of temperature and stress intensity on crack growth rate in water and water-saturated argon environments. Source: Ref 3.49 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 5.6 Effect of nickel content on maximum crack growth rate (CGR) and threshold stress-intensity factor for Fe-Ni-Cr alloys in hot chloride solutions. Source: Ref 5.21 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 5.23 Crack growth rate in pressurized water reactor (PWR) primary water simulant as a function of nickel content and temperature. Source: Ref 5.101 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 6.5 Comparison between observed and predicted crack growth rate vs. solution conductivity for (a) statically loaded type 316L and (b) sensitized type 304 stainless steels in 288 °C (550 °F) water containing 200 ppb O 2 . Source: Ref 6.32 – 6.35 More