Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
crack growth rate
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 696 Search Results for
crack growth rate
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 December 2003
Fig. 14 Crack growth rate ( da / dN ) as a function of the energy release rate, J I , for a single-edge notched polycarbonate specimen with 0.33 mm (0.013 in.) thickness
More
Image
Published: 01 December 2003
Fig. 15 Crack growth rate ( da / dN ) as a function of the energy release rate, J I , (tearing energy) for a rubber compound. J Ic , critical energy release rate
More
Image
in Mechanical Properties and Testing of Titanium Alloys[1]
> Titanium: Physical Metallurgy, Processing, and Applications
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 6.27 Fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) scatter band data comparing Ti-6Al-4V cast and cast plus hot isostatic pressed (HIP) material with beta-annealed ingot metallurgy material
More
Image
in Melting, Casting, and Powder Metallurgy[1]
> Titanium: Physical Metallurgy, Processing, and Applications
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 8.15 Fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) scatter band data comparing Ti-6Al-4V cast and cast + hot isostatic pressed (HIP) material with beta-annealed ingot metallurgy material
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 3.17 Schematic illustration of variation of fatigue crack growth rate, da/dN , with alternating stress intensity, Δ K , in steels, showing regions of primary crack growth mechanisms
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 5.51 Effect of stress ratio on fatigue crack growth rate threshold for several aluminum alloys. Source: Ref 5.27
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 5.52 Effect of stress ratio on fatigue crack growth rate threshold for titanium alloys. Source: Ref 5.54
More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 5.53 Effect of stress ratio on fatigue crack growth rate threshold for several low- to medium-strength steels. Source: Ref 5.55
More
Image
in Mechanisms of Stress-Corrosion Cracking[1]
> Stress-Corrosion Cracking<subtitle>Materials Performance and Evaluation</subtitle>
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 1.18 Effect of potential on the maximum crack growth rate in sensitized type 304 stainless steel in 0.1 MNa 2 SO 4 at 250 °C (480 °F). Numbers denote K I values.
More
Image
in Mechanisms of Stress-Corrosion Cracking[1]
> Stress-Corrosion Cracking<subtitle>Materials Performance and Evaluation</subtitle>
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 1.20 Schematic of crack growth rate vs. temperature for intergranular SCC of type 304 stainless steel
More
Image
in Mechanisms of Stress-Corrosion Cracking[1]
> Stress-Corrosion Cracking<subtitle>Materials Performance and Evaluation</subtitle>
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 1.28 Crack growth rate vs. elastic-plastic stress intensity for iron and nickel tested in 1 N H 2 SO 4 at given cathodic overpotentials (COP). (a) 2 mm (0.08 in.) thick iron and nickel. (b) 10 mm (0.4 in.) thick iron and nickel
More
Image
in Mechanisms of Stress-Corrosion Cracking[1]
> Stress-Corrosion Cracking<subtitle>Materials Performance and Evaluation</subtitle>
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 1.38 Schematic of crack growth rate vs. temperature for (a) 3% Ni steel in water ( Ref 1.99 ) and (b) 4340 steel in gaseous hydrogen ( Ref 1.100 )
More
Image
in Stress-Corrosion Cracking of High-Strength Steels (Yield Strengths Greater Than 1240 MPa)[1]
> Stress-Corrosion Cracking<subtitle>Materials Performance and Evaluation</subtitle>
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 3.25 Crack growth rate as a function of stress intensity in steels B6 and B7 compared with that of steel B2. Source: Ref 3.40
More
Image
in Stress-Corrosion Cracking of High-Strength Steels (Yield Strengths Greater Than 1240 MPa)[1]
> Stress-Corrosion Cracking<subtitle>Materials Performance and Evaluation</subtitle>
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 3.42 Effects of temperature and stress intensity on crack growth rate in water and water-saturated argon environments. Source: Ref 3.49
More
Image
in Stress-Corrosion Cracking of Nickel-Base Alloys[1]
> Stress-Corrosion Cracking<subtitle>Materials Performance and Evaluation</subtitle>
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 5.6 Effect of nickel content on maximum crack growth rate (CGR) and threshold stress-intensity factor for Fe-Ni-Cr alloys in hot chloride solutions. Source: Ref 5.21
More
Image
in Stress-Corrosion Cracking of Nickel-Base Alloys[1]
> Stress-Corrosion Cracking<subtitle>Materials Performance and Evaluation</subtitle>
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 5.23 Crack growth rate in pressurized water reactor (PWR) primary water simulant as a function of nickel content and temperature. Source: Ref 5.101
More
Image
in Irradiation-Assisted Stress-Corrosion Cracking[1]
> Stress-Corrosion Cracking<subtitle>Materials Performance and Evaluation</subtitle>
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 6.5 Comparison between observed and predicted crack growth rate vs. solution conductivity for (a) statically loaded type 316L and (b) sensitized type 304 stainless steels in 288 °C (550 °F) water containing 200 ppb O 2 . Source: Ref 6.32 – 6.35
More