Fig. 14 Crack growth rate ( da / dN ) as a function of the energy release rate, J I , for a single-edge notched polycarbonate specimen with 0.33 mm (0.013 in.) thickness More

Fig. 15 Crack growth rate ( da / dN ) as a function of the energy release rate, J I , (tearing energy) for a rubber compound. J Ic , critical energy release rate More

Fig. 6.27 Fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) scatter band data comparing Ti-6Al-4V cast and cast plus hot isostatic pressed (HIP) material with beta-annealed ingot metallurgy material More

Fig. 8.15 Fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) scatter band data comparing Ti-6Al-4V cast and cast + hot isostatic pressed (HIP) material with beta-annealed ingot metallurgy material More

Fig. 3.17 Schematic illustration of variation of fatigue crack growth rate, da/dN , with alternating stress intensity, Δ K , in steels, showing regions of primary crack growth mechanisms More

Fig. 5.38 Fatigue crack growth rate correlation technique More

Fig. 5.42 Typical shape of a fatigue crack growth rate curve for a given R value More

Fig. 5.43 Fatigue crack growth rate data for 2024-T351 aluminum with six R -ratios More

Fig. 5.51 Effect of stress ratio on fatigue crack growth rate threshold for several aluminum alloys. Source: Ref 5.27 More

Fig. 5.52 Effect of stress ratio on fatigue crack growth rate threshold for titanium alloys. Source: Ref 5.54 More

Fig. 5.53 Effect of stress ratio on fatigue crack growth rate threshold for several low- to medium-strength steels. Source: Ref 5.55 More

Fig. 1.18 Effect of potential on the maximum crack growth rate in sensitized type 304 stainless steel in 0.1 MNa 2 SO 4 at 250 °C (480 °F). Numbers denote K I values. More

Fig. 1.20 Schematic of crack growth rate vs. temperature for intergranular SCC of type 304 stainless steel More

Fig. 1.28 Crack growth rate vs. elastic-plastic stress intensity for iron and nickel tested in 1 N H 2 SO 4 at given cathodic overpotentials (COP). (a) 2 mm (0.08 in.) thick iron and nickel. (b) 10 mm (0.4 in.) thick iron and nickel More

Fig. 1.38 Schematic of crack growth rate vs. temperature for (a) 3% Ni steel in water ( Ref 1.99 ) and (b) 4340 steel in gaseous hydrogen ( Ref 1.100 ) More

Fig. 3.25 Crack growth rate as a function of stress intensity in steels B6 and B7 compared with that of steel B2. Source: Ref 3.40 More

Fig. 3.42 Effects of temperature and stress intensity on crack growth rate in water and water-saturated argon environments. Source: Ref 3.49 More

Fig. 5.6 Effect of nickel content on maximum crack growth rate (CGR) and threshold stress-intensity factor for Fe-Ni-Cr alloys in hot chloride solutions. Source: Ref 5.21 More

Fig. 5.23 Crack growth rate in pressurized water reactor (PWR) primary water simulant as a function of nickel content and temperature. Source: Ref 5.101 More

Fig. 6.5 Comparison between observed and predicted crack growth rate vs. solution conductivity for (a) statically loaded type 316L and (b) sensitized type 304 stainless steels in 288 °C (550 °F) water containing 200 ppb O 2 . Source: Ref 6.32 – 6.35 More