Fig. 3.29 Parabolic rate constants of several oxides. Source: Ref 2 More

Fig. 4.38 Nitridation rate constants as a function of the alloy’s nickel concentration when tested in N 2 -5%H 2 at 1000 and 1100 °C (1830 and 2010 °F). Source: Ref 51 More

Fig. 5.19 Carburization rate constants of several Fe-Ni-Cr alloys at 825 °C (1520 °F) in the test environment with a carbon activity of 0.8 and an oxygen potential such that SiO 2 is stable (but not Cr 2 O 3 ), as shown in Fig. 5.18 . Source: Ref 35 More

Fig. 5.20 Carburization rate constants as a function of silicon content in the alloy for several Fe-Ni-Cr alloys tested at 825 °C (1520 °F) in the test environment with a carbon activity of 0.8 and an oxygen potential such that SiO 2 is stable (but not Cr 2 O 3 ), as shown in Fig. 5.18 More

Fig. 5.21 Carburization rate constants of several Fe-Ni-Cr alloys at 1000 °C (1830 °F) in the test environment with a carbon activity of 0.8 and an oxygen potential such that SiO 2 is not stable as shown in Fig. 5.18 . Source: Ref 35 More

Fig. 5.22 Carburization rate constants as a function of Ni to Cr + Fe ratio [Ni/(Cr + Fe)] for several Fe-Ni-Cr alloys tested at 1000 °C (1830 °F) in the test environment with a carbon activity of 0.8 and an oxygen potential such that SiO 2 is not stable as shown in Fig. 5.18 . Source: Ref More

Fig. 7.10 Parabolic rate constants for Fe-Cr, Ni-Cr, and Co-Cr alloys as a function of chromium content. Source: Ref 18 More

Fig. 7.11 Parabolic rate constants for Fe-Cr-Al and Co-Cr-Al alloys as a function of aluminum content. Source: Ref 18 More

Fig. 7.47 Initial linear rate constants of nickel in different SO 2 -O 2 mixtures at 1 atm and 800 °C (1470 °F). Also shown are equilibrium SO 3 pressures at different SO 2 -O 2 mixtures. Source: Ref 83 More

Fig. 7.48 Parabolic rate constants of Ni-Cr alloys as a function of chromium concentration in SO 2 :O 2 mixture (2:1 ratio) at various temperatures. Source: Ref 93 More

Fig. 12.67 PWA 1480 SCDS superalloy compliance constants vs. temperature More

Fig. 1.16 Determination of constants A and B for creep equation ε = A ( t ) 1/3 + B ( t ) for Mo-V steel of Fig. 1.14 . In this figure, only the data at times higher than 50 h were used in order to get the best results. Similar analysis using all the data also gave reasonably good More

Fig. 1.17 Determination of constants A and B for creep equation ε = A (σ) m ( t ) 1/3 + B (σ) n ( t ) for 0.3Mo-0.23V steel of Fig. 1.14 . Calculated from Fig. 1.14 . Source: Prepared by S. Hailu More

Fig. 2.11 Correlation between minimum-commitment method parameter constants (a) R 1 and R 2 and (b) D and E More

Fig. 16-6 Variation of elastic constants with fiber orientation More

Figure 1.9 Difference between adiabatic and isothermal elastic constants as a function of temperature for the case of iron. More

Figure 9.18 Li–Mg–alloy transformation temperatures, elastic constants, and lattice parameters for f.c.c. and b.c.c. at 295 K and for h.c.p. at 77 K ( Barrett and Trautz, 1948 ; Barrett and Clifton, 1950 ; Barrett, 1956b ; Trivisonno and Smith, 1961 ). The T md (f.c.c.) represents More

Figure 9.24 Lattice parameters and elastic constants of Nb 3 Sn structures as a function of temperature. Lattice parameter data: o — Mailfert, Batterman, and Hanak (1969) ; □ — Vieland (1972) ; Δ — Reed, Gatos, LaFleur, and Roddy (1969) . Elastic constant data: Rehald (1968); Vieland More