1-20 of 683 Search Results for

cold rolling

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 8.2 Cold rolling process. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 8.3 Preferred orientation in copper during cold rolling. Source: Ref 3 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 2.29 Evolution of grain structure in cold rolling and annealing. Source: Ref 2.1 More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 7.2 (Part 2) (e) Normalized from 860 °C, reduced 50% by cold rolling. 310 HV. Picral. 1000×. (f) Normalized from 860 °C, reduced 50% by cold rolling, heated at 650 °C for 1 h, air cooled. 190 HV. Picral. 1000×. (g) Normalized from 860 °C, reduced 50% by cold rolling, heated at 650 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 12.58 (a) Defect that gave rise to the rupture, during cold rolling of a thin sheet of steel. (b) Longitudinal cross section of the sheet, tangential to the edge of one of the defects. The surface of the sheet is at the bottom of the image. The dark line is the crack, slightly opened More
Image
Published: 01 October 2011
Fig. 3.20 Effect of cold rolling on grains More
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 19.10 Integrated cold rolling and annealing line More
Image
Published: 01 March 2006
Fig. 1 Schematic presentation of cold rolling a copper-zinc alloy (60% reduction). Hardness was 78 HRB before reduction, which increased to 131 HRB after reduction. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2013
Fig. 29 Integrated cold rolling and annealing line. Source: Ref 18 More
Image
Published: 30 June 2023
Fig. 15.18 Earing profiles showing how the different hot- and cold-rolling processes combine to produce a more balanced earing pattern in the H19 sheet: (a) annealed hot-mill coil, (b) final gauge H19 sheet, and (c) typical cold-rolled earing pattern More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 17 Effect of cold rolling on grain shape in cartridge brass. (a) Grain structure in annealed bar. (b) Grain structure in same bar after 50% reduction by rolling. Diagram in the lower left of each micrograph indicates orientation of the view relative to the rolling plane of the sheet. 75× More
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 8.1 Dislocation density in Fe-3%Si alloy. (a) Cold rolled 5%. (b) Cold rolled 20%. (c) Cold rolled 90%. Source: Ref 1 More
Image
Published: 01 March 2002
Fig. 3.11 Microstructure of a cold-rolled, low-carbon steel sheet. Cold-worked (a) 30%, (b) 50%, (c) 70%, and (d) 90%. Marshall’s etch. 500× More
Image
Published: 01 August 2013
Fig. 5.13 Forming limit diagrams for various cold rolled DP steel grades. Source: Ref 5.1 More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 7.2 (Part 1) Spheroidization of pearlite in 0.6% C normalized and cold-rolled steels. 0.61C-0.08Si-0.6Mn (wt%). (a) Normalized from 860 °C. 185 HV. Picral. 1000×. (b) Normalized from 860 °C, reduced 25% by cold rolling. 265 HV. Picral. 1000×. (c) Normalized from 860 °C, reduced 25 More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 7.3 (Part 1) Spheroidization of pearlite in 0.6% C normalized and cold-rolled steels. 0.61C-0.08Si-0.6Mn (wt%). (a) Normalized from 860 °C, reduced 75% by cold rolling. 340 HV. Picral. 1000×. (b) Normalized from 860 °C, reduced 75% by cold rolling, heated at 650 °C for 1 h, air cooled More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 12.3 Temperature-time processing schedules for cold-rolled and annealed low-carbon sheet steels. Continuous and batch annealing are schematically compared and intercritical annealing used to produce dual-phase and TRIP steels is indicated. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 12.5 Microstructure of 0.08% C-1.45% Mn-0.21% Si steel. (a) Cold rolled 50%. (b) Annealed at 700 °C (1290 °F) for 20 min. Light micrographs, nital etch. Source: Ref 12.9 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 12.6 Volume percent ferrite recrystallized in a cold-rolled 0.08% C-1.45% Mn-0.21% Si steel as a function of time in salt bath at temperatures indicated. Source: Ref 12.9 More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 4.5 (Part 1) Cold-rolled low-carbon strip. Rimming grade. (a) 0.08C-0.005Si-0.45Mn (wt%). As-rolled to a reduction of 40%. 195 HV. 3% nital. 100×. (b) 0.08C-0.005Si-0.45Mn (wt%). As-rolled to a reduction of 40%. 195 HV. 1% nital + picral. 2000×. (c) 0.06C-0.005Si-0.35Mn (wt More