Fig. 6.2 Effect of normal force on the coefficient of friction of copper (Cu) in continuous unlubricated sliding on type 316 stainless steel (SS) More

Fig. 11.9 Effect of normal force on the coefficient of friction (kinetic) of acetal versus 316 stainless steel More

Fig. 7.12 (a) Coefficient of friction and (b) wear rate of Al5056 and Al5056-SiC coatings. Source: Ref 7.54 More

Fig. 3.2 The coefficient of friction of various web materials, thin materials that can be conveyed on rollers, versus a 4-in. diam. aluminum roller with a 0.5 μm roughness average (R a ) hardcoat finish. Test velocity was 0.1 m/s. Six replicates were conducted on a fresh surface of each More

Fig. 3.16 Correlation of sole rubber hardness with coefficient of friction versus prefinished oak flooring More

Fig. 3.18 Coefficient of friction of candidate bearing for a slow-moving linear slide that could tolerate no stick-slip behavior More

Fig. 9.7 Coefficient of friction (μ k ) of various stainless steel couples wear tested in a thrust bearing type of contact. (e.g., Fig. 9.8 ) More

Fig. 10.5 Coefficient of friction of various ceramics in block-on-ring testing, where * indicates thermal spray coatings More

Fig. 10.10 Coefficient of friction of silicon carbide versus various metals in vacuum More

Fig. 10.22 Coefficient of friction (kinetic) of various cemented carbide couples in block-on-ring testing, where * indicates thermal spray coatings More

Fig. 11.8 Ranges of coefficient of friction for plastic versus steel tribosystems (from various plastics manufacturers’ catalogs). PTFE, polytetrafluoroethylene More

Fig. 11.10 Static coefficient of friction of various plastics versus 52100 steel (60 HRC). PE, polyethylene; PTFE; polytetrafluoroethylene; PP, polypropylene; PBT, polybutylene terephthalate; PEEK, polyetheretherketone; PA, polyamide; PET, polyethylene terephthalate; PMMA More

Fig. 11.21 Breakaway coefficient of friction of 14 commercially manufactured shoes (soles) on prefinished oak flooring More

Fig. 11.24 Kinetic coefficient of friction (COF) of four different shoes (same wearer) versus an aluminum walking surface using normal gait More

Fig. 11.26 Breakaway coefficient of friction (COF) of five rubbers sliding on three different counterfaces using the ASTM International D1894 test procedure. PTFE, polytetrafluoroethylene; CBR, cis polybutadiene rubber; CR, chloroprene rubber; EPDM, ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber; SBR More

Fig. 12.8 Kinetic coefficient of friction of test couples measured during steady-state wear in the ASTM International G77 block-on-ring test More

Fig. 7.16 Effect of die pressure on mean coefficient of friction, μ m . Source: Ref 7.23 More

Fig. 7.17 Effect of furnace temperature on mean coefficient of friction, μ m , both under the dry condition and with a lubricant (Lub.), for two types of steel. Source: Ref 7.23 More

Fig. 7.18 Effect of scale thickness on mean coefficient of friction, μ m . Source: Ref 7.24 More

Fig. 14.8 Breakaway coefficient of friction in an inclined plane test (ASTM International G214) of aluminum versus liquid-covered polytetrafluoroethylene More