1-20 of 541 Search Results for

bending fatigue

Sort by
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 December 2004
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.aacppa.t51140253
EISBN: 978-1-62708-335-5
... Abstract This data set contains the results of rotating-beam reversed-bending fatigue tests for a wide range of aluminum casting alloys. These fatigue curves are the results of tests on individual lots of material considered representative of the respective alloys and tempers. aluminum...
Image
Published: 01 June 1985
Fig. 4-6. Helical gear, 1.12×. Tooth bending fatigue followed by tooth bending impact. Origin is off-center of the tooth midpoint but is directly above the center of the web. More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 3.40 Comparison of smooth-rotating/pure-bending fatigue test data for 2014-T6 aluminum in dripping commercial synthetic solution and in room-temperature air. A flow of liquid around the center section of the specimen was supplied by capillary action during the test. Source: Ref 3.37 More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 36 Results of reverse bending fatigue tests showing the effect of surface treatments on fatigue life of welded and nonwelded aluminum alloys Coated Chromate etch primer plus a two-component aluminum-pigmented epoxy top coat Peened Brush shot peened to Almen 6 level Air More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 2.16 Effect of decarburization on the bending fatigue strength of a Cr-Mn-Ti steel of varying core carbon. Source: Ref 15 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 3.13 A comparison of the bending fatigue strengths of carburized 12KhN3 gears illustrating the adverse influence of cementite networks. Note that these tests were carried out over a period of about 10 years; therefore, there may have also been other factors involved in producing More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 3.14 The bending fatigue strength of carburized samples of SAE 6120, comparing those containing a partial network of cementite with those free from cementite. Source: Ref 23 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 3.15 Bending fatigue S-N curves at a stress ratio of R = 0.1 for (a) Vacuum-A showing an endurance limit of 1370 MPa (200 ksi) and for (b) Vacuum-B showing an endurance limit of 1235 MPa (180 ksi). Considerable scatter in the data exists for both Vacuum-A and Vacuum-B conditions. Carbides More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 3.16 The effect of heat treatment and edge carbides on the bending fatigue endurance of case-hardened SAE 8620 and Ex 24. Source: Ref 14 Heat treatment sequence Edge carbides 1. Carburize 930 °C, 132 min; diffuse 48 min; cool to 845 °C; oil quench 70 °C Massive carbides More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 5.21 Hardness, retained austenite, microcrack density, and bending fatigue curves for carburized and hardened SAE 8620 steel quenched by three methods: direct quench, ASTM 1-3 grain size; single reheat, ASTM 4-5 grain size; double reheat. Source: Ref 43 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 5.44 Rotating bending fatigue of samples initiated by B (alumina, irregular), D (calcium aluminate, spherical), and T (titanium carbonitride, cuboid) type inclusions in an SAE 52100 steel. Source: Ref 65 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 6.30 Effect of nickel content and case depth on the bending fatigue strength of case-hardened steels. Source: Ref 36 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 6.38 Alternating bending fatigue strength of carburized test pieces in relation to case depth and section ratio. (a) 6 mm diam. (b) 12 mm diam. Source: Ref 40 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 7.13 Effect of tempering temperature on the alternating bending fatigue strength of 6 mm diam case-hardened test pieces. Carburized at 930 °C for 1 h, water quenched, reheated to 850 °C for 10 minutes, and oil quenched. Note: Ck15 steel was water quenched from 850 °C. Source: Ref 25 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 7.15 Bending-fatigue strength of notched test pieces with and without retained austenite. Source: Ref 29 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 7.16 Effect of tempering on the alternating bending-fatigue strength of two case-hardened steels. Source: Ref 25 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 7.26 Bending-fatigue strength of a carburized SAE 8620 steel (6.35 mm diam). Source: Ref 47 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 8.14 Comparison of bending fatigue strength of conventionally processed (cut/harden/lap) versus CBN ground (cut/harden/lap) spiral bevel gears. Test gear design specifications: hypoid design, 4.286 dp, 11 by 45 ratio, 1.60 in. face. Gears were installed in axles using a 4-square loaded More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 8.16 Effect of local case thinning by grinding on the bending fatigue strength of Ni-Cr steel gear teeth. Source: Ref 16 More
Image
Published: 01 December 1999
Fig. 8.32 Effect of peening, honing, and polishing on the reversed bending fatigue strength of a carburized alloy steel. Source: Ref 35 More