1-20 of 1130 Search Results for

bars

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 August 2015
Fig. 5.21 Residual stress patterns in cold-drawn 1045 steel bars. Bars were cold drawn 20% from 43 to 38 mm ( 1 11 16 to 1½ in.). Source: Ref 5 More
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 April 2013
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.imub.t53720321
EISBN: 978-1-62708-305-8
... Abstract This chapter focuses on the inspection of steel bars for the detection and evaluation of flaws. The principles involved also apply, for the most part, to the inspection of steel wire. The nondestructive inspection methods discussed include magnetic particle inspection, liquid penetrant...
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 12.25 Residual stress patterns in 5 cm (2 in.) diameter steel bars. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2001
Fig. 15 Ultimate tensile strength versus hydrogen porosity for sand-cast bars of three aluminum alloys More
Image
Published: 01 March 2002
Fig. 13.3 Uncoated nickel-base superalloy erosion test bars after 899 °C (1650 °F) isothermal hot corrosion test. Left to right: cast Udimet 700, wrought Udimet 700, Waspaloy, IN-100, B-1900, MAR-M-246, INCO 728, and MC 102 More
Image
Published: 01 May 2018
FIG. 9.11 Finished bars of titanium that are forged into joint replacement parts. Source: www.surgicalimplanttitanium.blogspot.com . More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 12.22 (Part 3) (i) Variation of hardness with depth in bars pack carburized at 940 °C for 2 h, given the diffusion treatments indicated, and then quench hardened. More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 12.23 (Part 3) (g) Variation of hardness with depth in carburized bars subsequently decarburized and quench hardened. The structures of the mildly decarburized bar are illustrated in Fig. 12.23 (Part 1) (a) to (f) , and those of the moderately decarburized bar in Fig. 12.24 . More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 16.6 Hardness distributions in water-quenched bars of SAE 1045 steel. The various bar diameters are indicated. Source: Ref 16.16 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 16.7 Hardness distribution in water-quenched bars of SAE 6140 steel. The various bar diameters are indicated. Source: Ref 16.16 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 16.8 Hardness distribution in oil-quenched bars of SAE 1045 steel. The various bar diameters are indicated. Source: Ref 16.16 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 16.9 Hardness distributions in oil-quenched bars of SAE 6140 steel. The various bar diameters are indicated. Source: Ref 16.16 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 16.16 Hardness at the center of water- and oil-quenched bars of SAE 3140 steel of various diameters. Source: Ref 16.16 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 16.27 Equivalent cooling rates for round bars quenched in (a) water and (b) oil. Correlation of equivalent cooling rates in the end-quenched hardenability specimen and quenched round bars free from scale. Data for surface hardness are for “mild agitation;” other data are for 60 m/min (200 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2018
Fig. 10.4 Tensile test bars, hardness and microstructure locations More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 10.42 Determination of the critical diameter according to Grossmann. (a) Bars with different diameters are quenched and the hardness profile is measured along the bar diameter. (b) The results of hardness measurements on the center of the bars may be presented in a single plot where More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 10.43 Hardness along bar diameter for bars of three different steels containing C = 0.4% (see Table 10.1 for the rest of the relevant chemical composition). Bars quenched in oil and quenched in water. The effect of the alloying elements on hardenability is evident. The bar diameters More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 11.5 Transverse cross sections of round bars of AISI 10V45 steel rolled from a continuous cast billet of 178 x 178 mm (7 x 7 in.) cross section. The deformation ratio during rolling was measured as the ratio between the initial and final cross-sectional areas (a) 7:1, (b) 10:1, (c) 27:1 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 14.37 MIG-MAG weld joining two bars of steel with a specified minimum yield strength of 500 MPa (73 ksi) of 6.3 and 16 mm (0.25 and 0.63 in.) diameters. Bars produced by the Tempcore process. Hardness in each region of the microstructure is indicated. (a) Layer of tempered martensite. (b More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Fig. 13 Centerline cooling curves for oil-quenched steel bars of varying section sizes, assuming a surface heat-transfer coefficient of 0.019 cal s –1 °C –1 cm 2 More