Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
austenitic grain size
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Book Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 661 Search Results for
austenitic grain size
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Image
in Steel Heat Treatment Failures due to Quenching
> Failure Analysis of Heat Treated Steel Components
Published: 01 September 2008
Image
in Conventional Heat Treatments—Usual Constituents and Their Formation
> Metallography of Steels: Interpretation of Structure and the Effects of Processing
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 9.47 The influence of austenitic grain size on the TTT curve of a steel containing C = 0.87%, Mn = 0.3%, and V = 0.27%. Source: Adapted from Ref 51
More
Image
in Conventional Heat Treatments—Usual Constituents and Their Formation
> Metallography of Steels: Interpretation of Structure and the Effects of Processing
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 9.48 The effect of austenitization temperature on the austenitic grain size for the same holding time at temperature for a silicon-deoxidized steel. Source: Adapted from Ref 52
More
Image
in Conventional Heat Treatments—Usual Constituents and Their Formation
> Metallography of Steels: Interpretation of Structure and the Effects of Processing
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 9.55 Standard deviation of the measured austenitic grain size in different combinations of time and temperature for austenitization. Steel containing C = 0.46%, Mn = 0.7%, Al = 0.02%, and N = 32 ppm. The spread in the grain size distribution increases in the temperature range where
More
Image
in Conventional Heat Treatment—Basic Concepts
> Metallography of Steels: Interpretation of Structure and the Effects of Processing
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 10.21 Austenitic grain size as a function of the number of normalizing cycles for the steel in Fig. 10.20 . Average of approximately 500 measurements per sample. 95% confidence intervals for the average are plotted. Source: Ref 14
More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Image
Published: 01 January 1998
Fig. 12-8 Austenitic grain size as a function of second austenitizing temperature of D2 steel after quenching from first austenitizing temperatures as indicated. The austenite grain size as a function of austenitizing temperature for specimens “single quenched” from a single austenitizing
More
Image
Published: 01 January 1998
Fig. 14-12 Austenitic grain size versus second austenitizing temperature for T1 and M2 high-speed steels. Type T1 was prequenched from 1290 °C (2350 °F) and type M2 from 1220 °C (2225 °F). Source: Ref 17
More
Image
Published: 01 December 1989
Fig. 2.31. Variation of FATT with austenitic grain size at fixed hardness and impurity levels ( Ref 85 ).
More
Image
Published: 01 September 2005
Image
Published: 01 December 2000
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 8.17 Comparison of austenitic grain size in (a) coarse-grained SAE 1015 steel and (b) fine-grained SAE 4615 steel after carburizing. Light micrographs. Original magnification: 1000×. Source: Ref 8.16
More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 7.4 (Part 2) (e) Normalized from 950 °C. A larger austenitic grain size has developed here than in the specimen shown in (a) due to the higher austenitizing temperature, and the proeutectoid cementite has precipitated during cooling as Widmanstätten intragranular plates as well as grain
More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 9.10 (Part 2) (e) Large austenitic grain size (parent structure similar to that shown in Fig. 8.8 (Part 1) c ). Austenitized at 730 °C, transformed at 20 °C, water quenched from the austenitizing temperature. 710 HV. Bisulfite. 250×. (f) Large austenitic grain size (parent structure
More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 9.28 (Part 4) (j) Variation with austenitic grain size of the amount of microcracking in a hardened 1.2% C steel. Source: Ref 26 .
More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 10.11 (Part 1) Revealing the austenitic grain size in a 0.3% C quenched-and-tempered steel. 0.25C-0.06Si-0.52Mn (wt%). (a) Austenitized at 860 °C, water quenched. Picral-HCl. 250×. (b) Austenitized at 860 °C, water quenched. Nital + aqueous picral. 250×. (c) Austenitized at 860 °C
More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 10.11 (Part 2) Revealing the austenitic grain size in a 0.3% C quenched-and-tempered steel. 0.25C-0.06Si-0.52Mn (wt%). (a) Austenitized at 860 °C, water quenched. Picral-HCl. 250×. (b) Austenitized at 860 °C, water quenched. Nital + aqueous picral. 250×. (c) Austenitized at 860 °C
More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 10.12 Revealing the austenitic grain size in a 0.5% C quenched-and-tempered steel. 0.50C-0.06Si-0.7Mn (wt%). (a) Austenitized at 960 °C, water quenched, tempered at 150 °C for 30 min. Picral-HCl. 250×. (b) Austenitized at 960 °C, water quenched, tempered at 325 °C for 30 min. Picral
More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 10.13 Revealing the austenitic grain size in a 0.8% C quenched-and-tempered steel. 0.79C-0.01Si-0.3Mn (wt%). (a) Austenitized at 860 °C, water quenched. Picral-HCl. 250×. (b) Austenitized at 860 °C, water quenched, tempered at 150 °C for 30 min. Picral-HCl. 250×. (c) Austenitized
More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 21.34 Fatigue limits as a function of austenitic grain size for 8719 steel carburized and hardened as marked. Source: Ref 21.57
More
1