1-20 of 1068 Search Results for

applied stress

Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 4.23 Relationship among applied potential, applied stress, and time to failure of solution-annealed type 304 in a 42% MgCl 2 solution at 144 °C (291 °F). After Ref 4.71 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 2.4 Definition of “threshold stress” for SCC from applied stress vs. time-to-failure plot. Source: Ref 2.27 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 21.18 Maximum applied stress versus cycles to failure ( S - N curve) for four-point bend fatigue specimens of 8620 steel given three different carburizing treatments. Source: Ref 21.31 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2015
Fig. 28 Schematic diagram of time to failure versus applied stress, σ, normalized to the yield strength σ y for stress corrosion More
Image
Published: 01 December 1989
Fig. 9.56. Effect of applied stress on permissible defect size for Nimocast 738 LC blade castings at 850 °C (1560 °F) and R = 0.9 ( Ref 85 ). More
Image
Published: 01 July 2009
Fig. 25.19 Effect of applied stress on the time to failure for pickled beryllium sheet immersed in synthetic seawater at 25 °C. Source: “This study,” Miller et al. 1967 ; Pickled and anodized data, Prochko et al. 1966 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 1.31 Schematic diagram of time to failure vs. applied stress, σ, normalized to the yield strength σ y for stress corrosion More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 4.11 Effect of applied stress on the time to failure of various alloys tested in a magnesium chloride solution boiling at 154 °C (309 °F). After Ref 4.41 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 4.12 Effect of applied stress on the time to failure of solution-annealed and electropolished type 347 tested in a magnesium chloride solution boiling at 145 °C (293 °F). After Ref 4.42 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 4.25 Effect of applied stress on the time to failure of tensile specimens of experimental ferritic Fe-17Cr-1Ni stainless steels containing various amounts of molybdenum in a magnesium chloride solution boiling at 140 °C (284 °F). After Ref 4.89 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 4.27 Effect of applied stress on the time to failure of various stainless steels in a magnesium chloride solution. After Ref 4.95 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 4.34 Effect of applied stress on the time to failure of type 347 in oxygenated sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide solutions at 300 °C (570 °F). After Ref 4.64 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 14.5 Plot of predicted time to failure as a function of applied stress for a 96% Al 2 O 3 . The slope and position of the dashed lines were determined from dynamic fatigue data. The points represent median times to failure of groups of 10 specimens under static stresses. After Ref 14.16 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 17.48 Relationship of applied stress and flaw depth to crack propagation in hydrogen gas. Dashed lines show an example of the use of such a chart for a steel with K th of 60.5  MPa m ( 55  ksi in . ) at an operating stress of 359 MPa (52 ksi). Source: Ref More
Image
Published: 01 September 2005
Fig. 24 Applied stress versus case depth (net strength) More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 5.56 Effect of applied stress on fatigue crack propagation More
Image
Published: 01 December 2001
Fig. 18 Effect of applied stress on the times to failure of tensile specimens of experimental ferritic Fe-17Cr-1Ni stainless steels containing various amounts of molybdenum in a magnesium chloride solution boiling at 140 °C (284 °F) More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 8.29 Creep crack growth as a function of applied stress-intensity factor for selected wrought aluminum alloys More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 4.39 Rupture time as a function of applied stress at room temperature for 0.15 mm (6 mils) thick joints made with silver-base filler metal between type 304 stainless steel components. Failure occurs through the thickness of the joint. The triaxial stress regime results in failure More
Image
Published: 01 December 1995
Fig. 6-47 Schematic diagrams of probability of occurrence of applied stress and material yield strength More