1-20 of 187 Search Results for

anisotropy

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 August 2012
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.smff.t53400033
EISBN: 978-1-62708-316-4
.... It discusses the effect of normal and planar anisotropy, the development and use of flow stress curves, and how formability is usually measured and expressed. It explains how formability measurements serve as a guide for process and tool design engineers as well as others. It also discusses the development...
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 12.10 Cold working polycrystalline materials will generate anisotropy of the grain shape: their elongation in the deformation direction is evident. Anisotropy increases with cold work. For small deformations (< approx. 10%), this anisotropy may not be observable in the metallographic More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 12.20 Two limiting cases of anisotropy in plastic deformation, considering (for simplicity) a single active slip system, characterized by slip planes (SP) and slip directions (SD). When subjected to axial tension (AT) in (a) the material will undergo reduction of the width without any More
Image
Published: 01 April 2013
Fig. 11 Anisotropy of ultrasound velocity in sintered transverse rupture strength bars. Source: Ref 8 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 18 Anisotropy parameter r versus the local axial true strain for various nominal strain rates. Data correspond to a Ti-21Al-22Nb alloy. Source: Ref 10 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 4.9 Sheet orientations relative to normal and planar anisotropy ( Ref 4.8 ) More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 5.9 Effect of anisotropy constants on the shape of Hill’s 1948 yield criterion in the plane stress condition More
Image
Published: 01 December 1984
Figure 5-19 Example of hardness anisotropy in zone-melted cobalt using 200-gf Knoop impressions, 42×. (Courtesy of R. D. Buchheit, Battelle Memorial Institute.) More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 6.9 Comparison of anisotropy ( r ) of various steels. Source: Ref 6.13 More
Image
Published: 01 March 2006
Fig. 12.52 Degree of anisotropy in properties of unidirectional fiber-oriented composites. (a) Stiffness ( Ref 12.20 ). (b) Tensile strength ( Ref 12.21 ) More
Image
Published: 01 December 1995
Fig. 3-39 The influence of forging reduction on anisotropy for a 0.35% carbon wrought steel ( 1 ). Properties for a 0.35% carbon cast steel are shown in the graph by a star (*) for purposes of comparison. More
Image
Published: 01 December 1995
Fig. 3-41 Anisotropy exhibited by fatigue strength and endurance limit in SAE 4340 forged steel ( 7 ) More
Image
Published: 01 December 1995
Fig. 10-10 The influence of forging reduction on anisotropy for a 0.35% carbon wrought steel ( 1 ). Properties for a 0.35% carbon cast steel are shown in the graph by a star (*) for purposes of comparison. More
Image
Published: 01 July 2009
Fig. 4.20 Comparison of the degree of thermal expansion anisotropy for beryllium fabricated by several techniques. A, 2% max BeO; B, 4% min BeO. Source: Jennings et al. 1966 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. A.10 Flow stress of DP 600 (1 mm) determined by tensile test and viscous pressure bulge test. Experimental strain range, tensile test: 0 to 0.15; bulge test without anisotropy correction: 0.04 to 0.49; bulge test with anisotropy correction: 0.05 to 0.55 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. A.11 Flow stress of DP 780 (1 mm) determined by tensile test and viscous pressure bulge (VPB) test. Experimental strain range, tensile test: 0 to 0.09; bulge test without anisotropy correction: 0.04 to 0.33; bulge test with anisotropy correction: 0.05 to 0.36 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. A.14 Flow stress of TRIP 780 (1 mm) determined by tensile test and viscous pressure bulge (VPB) test. Experimental strain range, tensile test: 0 to 0.14; bulge test without anisotropy correction: 0.04 to 0.26; bulge test with anisotropy correction: 0.05 to 0.25 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. A.12 Flow stress of DP 780-CR (1 mm) determined by tensile test and viscous pressure bulge (VPB) test. Experimental strain range, tensile test: 0 to 0.1; bulge test without anisotropy correction: 0.04 to 0.22; bulge test with anisotropy correction: 0.05 to 0.24 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. A.13 Flow stress of DP 780-HY (1 mm) determined by tensile test and viscous pressure bulge (VPB) test. Experimental strain range, tensile test: 0 to 0.75; bulge test without anisotropy correction: 0.04 to 0.45; bulge test with anisotropy correction: 0.05 to 0.5 More
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 July 2009
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.bcp.t52230151
EISBN: 978-1-62708-298-3
... to the anisotropy of elastic constants and slip properties, resulting in a specific stiffness, or modulus-to-density ratio, six times higher than that of any other structural material. beryllium ductility elastic properties tensile properties thermal properties 13.1 Beryllium Phases and Phase...