Fig. 5 Abrasive wear volume at various loads and SiC abrasive papers as a function of volume fraction of short glass fibers (GF) in polyether-imide. Speed, 5 cm/s in single-pass condition; distance slid, 3.26 m. (a) 120 grade, grit size ≃118 μm. (b) 80 grade, grit size ≃175 μm. Source: Ref 29 More

Fig. 2-3. Abrasive wear progresses rapidly and uniformly when an abrasive contaminant saturates the lubricant. More

Fig. 2 Scanning electron microscope image of an area of abrasive wear on a soft, low-carbon-steel shaft bearing component, showing classic features of material “cutting” action (100×). More

Fig. 3 Abrasive wear of a yarn eyelet made of hardened and tempered 1095 steel. Grooving was caused by a sharp change in direction of the yarn as it came out of the hole. Service life was improved by changing the eyelet material to M2 high-speed tool steel, which contains spheroidal carbides More

Fig. 12.7 Three-body abrasive wear of surface treatments tested with the ASTM International G65 dry sand/rubber wheel abrasion test, Procedure C. Plotted data are the average of four tests per surface treatment, where * indicates not heat treated, and ** indicates aged 2 h at 650 °F. More

Fig. 5 Types of contact during abrasive wear. (a) Open two-body. (b) Closed two-body. (c) Open three-body. (d) Closed three-body More

Fig. 6 Schematics illustrating the four types of abrasive wear. (a) Low-stress abrasion where material is removed by hard, sharp particles or other hard, sharp surfaces plowing material out in furrows. (b) High-stress abrasion characterized by scratching, plastic deformation of surfaces More

Fig. 7 Five mechanisms of abrasive wear More

Fig. 25 Abrasive wear. (a) Free particle between two surfaces. (b) Particle attached to one of the surfaces. (c) Sharp asperity. (d) Erosion More

Fig. 21 Effect of retained austenite (RA) on abrasive wear. Sample A, HRC = 59.7±1.8, RA = 37; sample B, HRC = 62.7±1.2, RA = 6%; and sample C, HRC = 61.4±1.5, RA = 23% More

Fig. 22.3 Two-body and three-body abrasive wear mechanisms [ Bay, 2002 ] More

Fig. 16.1 Examples of three processes of abrasive wear observed using a scanning electron microscope. (a) Cutting. (b) Wedge formation. (c) Plowing. Source: Ref 16.1 More

Fig. 2 Relative abrasive wear loss of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and composites filled with quartz and glass against abrasives SiC (45 μm), SiO 2 (10 μm), and CaCO 3 (3 μm) as a function of filler volume fraction, V f . WIB, weak interfacial bond; SIB, strong interfacial bond. 1, WIB More

Fig. 4 Influence of various properties of reinforcing phase on abrasive wear of composite. Source: Ref 2 More

Fig. 7 (a) Abrasive wear mechanisms and surface deformation as a function of pressure, P; material hardness, H; and fracture energy, G Ic . L , normal load; V , velocity. (b) Curves 1 to 3 correspond to the schematic in (a), possible schematic of the wear rate, W , as a function More

Figure 4.6: Asperity attack angle and semi-cone angle in abrasive wear. More

Fig. 2 Types of contact during abrasive wear. (a) Open two-body. (b) Closed two-body. (c) Open three-body. (d) Closed three-body. Source: Ref 2 More

Fig. 3 Five processes of abrasive wear. Source: Ref 2 More

Fig. 4 Examples of three processes of abrasive wear, observed using a scanning electron microscope. (a) Cutting. (b) Wedge formation. (c) Plowing. Source: Ref 3 More

Fig. 5 Abrasive wear of a yarn eyelet made of hardened and tempered 1095 steel. Grooving was caused by a sharp change in direction of the yarn as it came out of the hole. Source: Ref 4 More