1-20 of 555 Search Results for

abrasion

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 5.16 Abrasion wear scars at a magnification of 15×. (a) Two-body abrasion from 30 μm alumina in ASTM G174 abrasion test. (b) Three-body abrasion from 60 mesh silica in ASTM G65 abrasion test More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 7.11 Abrasion of various metals using the ASTM G174 two-body abrasion test (200 g, 680 belt passes, 30 μm alumina) More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 10.12 Abrasion volume in a two-body abrasion test (in accordance with ASTM International G174) using 30 μm alumina finishing tape More
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 29.16 Abrasion data for various cobalt-base alloys. Source: Ref 11 More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 15 Scratches in a nitrocellulose coating on aluminum induced by light abrasion. Hills and valleys in the foil are induced by a diamond-imprint gravure roll that applies the nitrocellulose as a lacquer. SEM. 200× More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 11.6 Three-body abrasion test results of various plastics using a reduced-cycle adaptation of ASTM International G65. UHMWPE, ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene; PTFE, polytetrafluoroethylene; PEEK, polyetheretherketone; ABS, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene; PPS, polyphenylene More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 11.7 Two-body abrasion test results of selected plastics. UHMWPE, ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene; PTFE, polytetrafluoroethylene; PVC, polyvinyl chloride; CE, canvas electrical grade; PMMA, polymethyl methacrylate; PI, polyimide More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 11.15 (a) Abrasion of 60 HRC 52100 steel in a ball-on-flat test (ASTM International G133). (b) The scratches are seen at 100× magnification. More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 11.25 Two-body abrasion test results of four rubbers using ASTM International G174. PUR, polyurethane; CR, chloroprene rubber; SBR, styrene-butadiene rubber; CBR, cis polybutadiene rubber More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 12.6 Two-body abrasion wear rates of various roller surfaces subjected to abrasion by silica-coated tape, where * indicates not age hardened. PVD, physical vapor deposition; TS, thermal spray More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 13.2 Tooth abrasion testing More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 13.10 Schematic of the abrasion of an eyeglass lens coating by a grain of sand More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 13.11 Abrasion of a plastic face shield More
Image
Published: 01 December 2003
Fig. 9 (Part 2) (e) PEI HY (O N ) showing excessive melting of AF and third-body abrasion due to loose grit (middle portion) on the softened matrix. (f) PEI CF (O P ) excessive breakage of an array of CF in both directions, resulting in high wear. (g) PEI CF (O N ) CF tips showing less More
Image
Published: 01 March 2001
Fig. 3 Major categories of wear based on abrasion, erosion, adhesion, and surface fatigue. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 March 2001
Fig. 15 Slurry erosion wear modes. (a) Abrasion-corrosion. (b) Scouring wear, with wear areas equal (left) and unequal (center and right). (c) Crushing and grinding. (d) High-velocity erosion. (e) Low-velocity erosion. (f) Saltation erosion. (g) Cavitation More
Image
Published: 01 March 2001
Fig. 7 Effect of structure and hardness on abrasion resistance. Source: adapted from Ref 44 More
Image
Published: 01 March 2001
Fig. 14 Effect of coating technique on the relative abrasion resistance of TiN on hardened steel applied by various processes. Source: Ref 64 More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 1.2 Abrasion of a stainless steel pump sleeve by glass-filled packing More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 4.17 Scratch testing to simulate abrasion; scratch width is the test metric; w, width; P, scratch load More