Fig. 13.1 Comparison of short-time tensile strength and tensile strength/density ratio for titanium alloys, three classes of steel, and 2024-T86 aluminum alloy. Data are not included for annealed alloys with less than 10% elongation or heat-treated alloys with less than 5% elongation. More

Fig. 8.6 Tensile strength and formability during hot forming. UTS, ultimate tensile strength. Source: Ref 8.6 More

Fig. 4 Notch tensile strength of high-strength steel plotted against testing temperature for three strain rates (crosshead speeds, ε ˙ ). Source: Ref 15 More

Fig. 32 Relationships between the fatigue strength and tensile strength of some wrought aluminum alloys. Source: Ref 11 More

Fig. 14.3 Tensile strength (UTS), yield strength, and elongation as a function of temperature for extruded Lockalloy LX62. Source: London 1979 More

Fig. 2.36 Strength across fusion weld joint. Ultimate tensile strength values are estimated from hardness readings. Source: Ref 2.26 More

Fig. 8.51 Ultimate tensile strength (UTS), yield strength (YS), and elongation of Ti-6Al-4V alloy produced using various additive manufacturing processes. DMD, direct-metal deposition; HIP, hot isostatic pressing; HT, heat treatment; LENS, laser-engineered net shaping ( Ref 8.16 ); DMLS More

Fig. 1 Effect of carbon content on steel strength. UTS, ultimate tensile strength; YS, yield strength. Source: Ref 1 More

Fig. 11.1 Effect of carbon content on steel strength. UTS, ultimate tensile strength; YS, yield strength More

Fig. 15.18 Changes in yield strength (a) and tensile strength (b) as a function of time at temperatures of 350 to 500 °C (660 to 930 °F). The as drawn strengths correspond to the 0 heating time, and the galvanized strengths are given by the horizontal dashed line. Source: Ref 15.50 More

Fig. 7.1. Effect of room-temperature tensile strength on 100,000-h rupture strength of quenched-and-tempered and normalized-and-tempered 2¼Cr-1Mo steel ( Ref 12 ). More

Fig. 20-4 Yield strength (0.2% offset) and tensile strength at room temperature as a function of ferrite content for CF-8 and CF-8M alloys. (Adapted from Beck et al.) More

Fig. 20-7 Effect of nitrogen on the tensile strength, yield strength, and elastic modulus in constant ferrite content CF-8 steels More

Fig. 8-47 (Part 1) Factors affecting (a) the tensile strength and (b) the yield strength of structural steels with a primary ferrite-pearlite microstructure. (From T. Gladman, D. Dulieu, and I.D. Mclvor, in MicroAlloying 75 , p 32, Union Carbide Corporation, New York (1977), Ref 24 ) More

Fig. 8-47 (Part 2) Factors affecting (a) the tensile strength and (b) the yield strength of structural steels with a primary ferrite-pearlite microstructure. (From T. Gladman, D. Dulieu, and I.D. Mclvor, in MicroAlloying 75 , p 32, Union Carbide Corporation, New York (1977), Ref 24 ) More

Fig. 9-26 Relation between yield strength and the tensile strength for steels. (From same source as Fig. 9-25 ) More

Fig. 9-27 Relation between the fatigue strength and the tensile strength for several steels. The straight lines have the slope shown. (Adapted from a compilation of T.J. Dola and C.S. Yen, Proc. ASTM , Vol 48, p 664 (1948), Ref 26 ) More

Fig. 6 Effect of material tensile strength or the fatigue strength of welded and unwelded specimens More

Fig. 10.6 Comparison of measured tensile strength (square symbols) and surface-diffusion-predicted strength evolution (model) for 60 min sintering in hydrogen at various temperatures. Experimental data are scattered due to factors such as delta ferrite content and grain size effects. More

Fig. 10.12 Tensile strength after sintering (vacuum and hydrogen) and heat treatment, plotted versus retained carbon content. This plot ignores density, grain size, and other factors, so only a range of properties is associated with each carbon level. More