1-20 of 841 Search Results for

Sensitization

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 December 2006
Fig. 7 Minimum sensitization time from a time-temperature-sensitization diagram as a function of carbon content for a typical 300-series stainless steel alloy. Source: Ref 14 More
Image
Published: 01 July 1997
Fig. 7 Minimum sensitization time from a time-temperature-sensitization diagram as a function of carbon content for a typical 300-series stainless steel alloy. Source: Ref 15 More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Fig. 21 ASTM International sensitization test results showing ditching characteristics More
Image
Published: 01 March 2002
Fig. 3.43 Microstructure of an AISI/SAE 316 stainless steel showing sensitization. Note the chromium carbides at the austenite grain boundaries. The steel was exposed to 675 °C (1250 °F) for 12 days. HCl/HNO 3 /H 2 O etch. 1000× More
Image
Published: 01 March 2002
Fig. 3.44 Microstructure of an AISI 316 stainless steel showing severe sensitization. Exposed to 730 °C (1350 °F) for two months. HCl/HNO 3 /H 2 O etch. 1000× More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 1.21 Temperature/sensitization curves determined by electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation (EPR) tests on type 304 stainless steel alloys with various carbon contents More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 5.3 Time-temperature-sensitization diagrams for various heats of alloy 800. The relative change of the magnetic susceptibility is reported below each point. The dotted lines define the conditions for chromium depletion. Source: Ref 5.9 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 5.4 Time-temperature-sensitization diagram for alloy 825, annealed at 1205 °C (2200 °F) for 1 h prior to sensitizing treatment. Source: Ref 5.10 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 28 Schematic illustration of sensitization due to chromium-rich precipitates that deplete adjacent regions of chromium. GB, grain boundary More
Image
Published: 01 December 2008
Fig. 29 Schematic illustration of how a heat treatment relates to sensitization due to precipitation kinetics. TTT, time-temperature-transformation More
Image
Published: 01 December 2015
Fig. 15 Diagram of weld decay (sensitization) in an austenitic stainless steel weldment. Source: Ref 3 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2015
Fig. 19 Time/temperature/sensitization curves determined by EPR tests on type 304 stainless steel alloys of variable carbon contents More
Image
Published: 01 December 2001
Fig. 10 Time-temperature-sensitization curves for type 304 stainless steel in a mixture of CuSO4 and H2SO4 containing free copper. Curves show the times required for carbide precipitation in steels with various carbon contents. Carbides precipitate in the areas to the right of the various More
Image
Published: 01 July 2000
Fig. 7.54 Time-temperature-sensitization curves for susceptibility to intergranular corrosion. Parameters are carbon concentrations in type 304-based stainless steels. Redrawn from Ref 83 More
Image
Published: 01 July 2000
Fig. 7.56 Time-temperature-sensitization curves for intergranular corrosion of type 347 stainless steel in boiling 65% nitric acid. mpy, mils per year. Source: Ref 85 More
Image
Published: 01 July 2000
Fig. 7.58 Time-temperature-sensitization curves for austenitic and ferritic stainless steels of equivalent chromium content. Redrawn from Ref 91 More
Image
Published: 01 July 2000
Fig. 7.64 Effect of sensitization time at 650 °C on anodic polarization of type 304 stainless steel in 2 N H 2 SO 4 . Redrawn from Ref 103 More
Image
Published: 01 July 2000
Fig. 7.68 Effect of welding on sensitization as a function of distance from the weld fusion line of type 304 stainless steel as determined by the EPR test. Redrawn from Ref 104 More
Image
Published: 01 July 2000
Fig. 7.107 Effect of sensitization heat treatment on stress-corrosion crack-growth rate of type 304 stainless steel in 22% NaCl solution at 105 °C. Sensitized 50 h at 630 °C. Increased chromium depletion at grain boundaries results in increased growth rate and lower threshold K. Source: Ref More
Image
Published: 01 December 2006
Fig. 6 Time-temperature-sensitization curves for type 304 stainless steel in a mixture of CuSO 4 and HSO 4 containing copper. Source: Ref 14 . Curves A and B indicate high and medium cooling rates, respectively. More