1-20 of 378 Search Results for

Interference

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 June 1985
Fig. 5-21. Tooth tip interference causing in-line pitting low on the active profile. A spalling action has resulted. More
Image
Published: 01 November 2019
Figure 24 An “interference image” produced by attempted pulse-echo analysis of the die attach in an overmolded BGA package. More
Image
Published: 01 November 2019
Figure 26 An interference image produced when analyzing the die attach layer using a 50 MHz transducer. More
Image
Published: 30 November 2013
Fig. 5 Elastic stress distribution: interference fit (press or shrink). T, tension. C, compression. More
Image
Published: 01 March 2002
Fig. 5.45 Sketch of a ray diagram of differential interference contrast illumination (Nomarski) in a metallurgical microscope. Note the polarizer and analyzer for polarized light and the Wollaston prism to split the light beam. More
Image
Published: 01 March 2002
Fig. 5.48 Micrograph showing interference fringes on a flat, polished specimen surface. Unetched. Taken with a green filter. 500× More
Image
Published: 01 March 2002
Fig. 8.52 Differential interference contrast used to reveal cold work in an AISI/SAE 1018 steel (the same sample shown in Fig. 8.32 ). 4% picral followed by 2% nital etch. 1000× More
Image
Published: 01 March 2002
Fig. 8.53 Differential interference contrast used for an air-cooled AISI/SAE 1018 steel (the same sample shown in Fig. 8.31 ). 4% picral followed by 2% nital etch. 1000× More
Image
Published: 01 December 2009
Fig. 12.5 Mechanical interference witness marks. This component seized as a result of mechanical interference with other components. Witness marks show where the interference occurred. More
Image
Published: 01 December 2003
Fig. 7 Interference pattern of optical surface. Fringes occur as the distance between surfaces increases by one-half wavelength (λ/2); d represents dip or rise of λ/2 in the surface. At helium-neon wavelength, this represents 0.318 μm (12.5 μin.). More
Image
Published: 01 November 2011
Fig. 3.6 Upper electrode wheels used to avoid interference with a sidewall: (a) small-diameter wheel and (b) canted, large-diameter wheel. Source: Ref 3.4 More
Image
Published: 01 March 2006
Fig. 10.4 Phase-interference method to determine strain distribution at notch tip. Source: Ref 10.9 More
Image
Published: 01 March 2006
Fig. 11.66 Effect of taper pin interference in fatigue life of small lugs. Source: Ref 11.75 More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 15.3 Wear marks from rotor/housing interference More
Image
Published: 01 December 1984
Figure 4-22 Examples of the use of interference-contrast illumination (DIC) for revealing microstructure. Top, bright-field illumination, bottom, interference-contrast illumination. On the left is a sample of alloy of Ti, 6% Al, and 4% V etched in 0.5% HF at 120 × magnification. On the right More
Image
Published: 01 December 1984
Figure 4-23 Schematic of Linnik system reflected light two-beam interference microscope. (Courtesy of E. Leitz, Inc.) More
Image
Published: 01 December 1984
Figure 4-24 Schematic diagram illustrating the light path in the Leitz interference contrast device R. More
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Fig. 11.26 Interference fit fasteners in composites. Source: Ref 4 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Fig. 11.27 Installation of sleeve-type interference fit fasteners. Source: Ref 4 More
Image
Published: 01 October 2011
Fig. 10 Schematic of a measuring facility by means of light interference More