1-20 of 596 Search Results for

Couplings

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 September 2011
Fig. 7.12 Drive shafts and couplings. AAAV, advanced amphibious assault vehicle More
Image
Published: 01 September 2011
Fig. 7.17 Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle propulsion couplings More
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 July 2000
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.fec.t65940127
EISBN: 978-1-62708-302-7
... Abstract This chapter develops a corrosion model that accounts for solution potentials and the effects of coupling between cathodic and anodic reactions. It begins by examining potential differences at various points (in the solution) along a path from the anode to the cathode area...
Image
Published: 01 March 2012
Fig. 5.23 Coupled zones (shaded regions) on eutectic phase diagrams. The coupled zones represent the interface temperature (solidification rate) dependent composition region in which a completely eutectic structure is obtained. (a) Nearly symmetrical coupled zone in regular eutectic. (b More
Image
Published: 01 December 2016
Fig. 1.37 Coupled growth front of the lamellar eutectic. (a) Diffusion flows of components in front of the plates of both eutectic phases (αAl and Si). (b) Silicon concentration profile in the liquid phase in front of the plates of both eutectic phases (αAl and Si). Source: Ref 1 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 14.11 Effect of galvanic coupling of titanium to less corrosion-resistant metals in seawater More
Image
Published: 01 March 2000
Fig. 14 Typical design of a dummy block. (a) Dummy block and coupling. (b) Stem with fixed dummy pad. Source: Castool More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 1.17 Bending of a beam. (a) A couple of forces applied at the ends of the beam, or lateral force acting on the supports at the ends of the beam. (b) Axial stress distribution in a beam subjected to bending moment M More
Image
Published: 01 August 1999
Fig. 2 Galvanic corrosion of aluminum shielding in buried telephone cable coupled to buried copper plates More
Image
Published: 01 March 2012
Fig. 12.11 Light micrograph of 367 °C (693 °F) diffusion couple between pure aluminum and pure magnesium. Electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) was used to identify the β, ε, and γ phases. Source: Ref 12.5 More
Image
Published: 01 October 2012
Fig. 3.18 Corrosion rates in 3% NaCl solution of magnesium alloy AZ31B coupled with aluminum containing varying amounts of iron and magnesium. The corrosion rate of uncoupled AZ31B is shown for comparison. Source: Ref 3.8 More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 12.8 Kinetic coefficient of friction of test couples measured during steady-state wear in the ASTM International G77 block-on-ring test More
Image
Published: 30 April 2021
Fig. 12.9 Adhesive wear of various self-mated couples in a block-on-ring wear test More
Image
Published: 01 November 2010
Fig. 1.7 Shear coupling in a 45° ply. Source: Ref 1 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2005
Fig. 7.9 Maximum strength of metal/alumina couples plotted as a function of the oxygen affinity of the braze More
Image
Published: 30 November 2013
Fig. 4 An aluminum plate riveted to a steel plate resulted in a galvanic couple and crevice corrosion that produced a significant amount of corrosion products between the two plates. The stresses generated as a result of the volume change of the corrosion products were sufficient More
Image
Published: 01 December 2015
Fig. 4 Schematic presentation of corrosion reaction in galvanic coupling of zinc and platinum More
Image
Published: 01 December 2015
Fig. 2 Galvanic corrosion of aluminum shielding in buried telephone cable coupled to buried copper plates. Courtesy of R. Baboian, Texas Instruments, Inc. More
Image
Published: 01 December 2015
Fig. 20 Corrosion currents for galvanic couples of UNS C1100 copper anodes versus UNS N08367 stainless steel cathodes with and without (control) the influence of natural marine microbial biofilms. Source: Ref 58 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2015
Fig. 21 Corrosion currents for galvanic couples of UNS A93003 aluminum alloy anodes versus UNS N08367 stainless steel cathodes with and without (control) the influence of natural marine microbial biofilms. Source: Ref 58 More