1-20 of 174 Search Results for

Bulging

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 January 2015
Fig. 11.14 Typical rubber bulging setup for the tube-bulging process with die-formed and free-formed configurations More
Image
Published: 01 August 2018
Fig. 8.62 “Bulging” mechanism that originates movement of the interdendritic liquid in continuous casting. Source: Ref 5 More
Image
Published: 01 December 2018
Fig. 6.12 Reheater tube sample showing bulging and bending at failure location with thick-lip fish-mouth rupture More
Image
Published: 01 December 2018
Fig. 6.32 (a) Fish-mouth thick-lip failure of a PSH tube; (b) bulging on outer surface of the tube More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 2.27 Bulging. Source: Ref 2.4 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 12.22 Effects of process parameters on bulging during flow forming. Source: Ref 12.17 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 12.23 Cracks caused by a large amount of bulging. Source: Ref 12.10 More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 8.18 Bulge formation in sheet hydroforming with punch. (a) Bulge at punch/blank holder interface and at inclined/tapered punch locations. (b) Due to uneven contact between sheet and tool, skid marks can occur because of sheet rubbing at sharp punch corners. Source: Ref 8.20 More
Series: ASM Technical Books
Publisher: ASM International
Published: 01 August 2012
DOI: 10.31399/asm.tb.smff.t53400221
EISBN: 978-1-62708-316-4
... Abstract This appendix contains flow stress data (in the form of flow curves) obtained by viscous pressure bulge tests conducted on various grades of sheet steel as well as aluminum and magnesium alloys. automotive sheet steels flow stress curves viscous pressure bulge test VISCOUS...
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. A.26 Comparison of flow stress curves obtained by viscous pressure bulge test and tensile test (a) for AKDQ steel (0.83 mm) and AA 5754-O (1.3 mm) and (b) for DP 600 (0.6 mm) and DDS (0.77 mm). Experimental strain range, for AKDQ, tensile: 0 to 0.24; AKDQ, bulge: 0 to 0.64; AA 5754-O More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 4.15 Schematic of hydraulic bulge test ( t 0 = original sheet thickness, t = sheet thickness at the apex, h d = bulge height, P = hydraulic pressure, r f = die fillet radius, r c = die cavity radius) More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 4.16 Example test specimens from bulge test More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 4.17 Schematic of infinitesimal element at the apex of the bulge test dome More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 4.18 Iterative procedure to estimate flow stress from bulge test ( Ref 4.16 ) More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 4.19 Pressure-time measurement in a hydraulic bulge test for AKDQ sheet material More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 4.20 Comparison of flow stress obtained from tensile test and bulge test for sheet materials DP600 and A5754-O More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 4.24 Dome height obtained from the hydraulic bulge test for different sheet materials (die diameter = 4 in.) More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 4.25 Dome height obtained from the hydraulic bulge test for sheet material SS304 from different sources (die diameter = 4 in.) More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 6.1 Flow stress curves obtained from the bulge test and the tensile test for (a) aluminum killed draw quality (AKDQ steel (0.83 mm) and AL5754-O (1.3 mm). Experimental strain range for AKDQ steel: tensile, 0 to 0.24; bulge, 0 to 0.64; for AL5754-O: tensile, 0 to 0.18; bulge, 0 to 0.4. More
Image
Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 6.2 Flow stress curves obtained from the bulge test and the tensile test for DP600 high-strength steel (0.6 mm thickness) and deep drawing steel (DDS; 0.77 mm thickness). Experimental strain range for DP600: tensile, 0 to 0.14; bulge, 0 to 0.27; for DDS: tensile, 0 to 0.23; bulge, 0 More