1-20 of 230 Search Results for

7075

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 9.17 Effects of T6 heat treatment on 7075 Al. YS, yield strength; UTS, ultimate tensile strength. Source: Ref 2 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 1.30 Examples of SCC in mode 1 and mode 3. (a) Susceptibility of 7075 aluminum alloy to corrosion cracking in 3.5% NaCl solution. Mode 1, solid lines; mode 3, dashed lines. P, peak of aging; OA, averaged; UA, under aged, (b) Crack-velocity vs. stress-intensity curves for SCC of type 304 More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 11.5 (Part 1) (a–h) Low-pressure cold spray repair, using a portable unit. (a) Al-7075-T73 helicopter mast with (b) corrosion pits in the lower lip of the snap ring groove. (c) Cross section of the pitted surface. (d) Pitted surface ground and rebuilt to print using the cold-sprayed More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 11.5 (Part 2) (a–h) Low-pressure cold spray repair, using a portable unit. (a) Al-7075-T73 helicopter mast with (b) corrosion pits in the lower lip of the snap ring groove. (c) Cross section of the pitted surface. (d) Pitted surface ground and rebuilt to print using the cold-sprayed More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 11.5 (Part 2) (a–h) Low-pressure cold spray repair, using a portable unit. (a) Al-7075-T73 helicopter mast with (b) corrosion pits in the lower lip of the snap ring groove. (c) Cross section of the pitted surface. (d) Pitted surface ground and rebuilt to print using the cold-sprayed More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 9.22 Slot in Al-7075 missile rail in the as-sprayed condition. Courtesy of South Dakota School of Mines and Technology More
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Fig. 9.24 Hinge fittings made from Al-7075-T6 that can be repaired without being removed from the aircraft. Courtesy of South Dakota School of Mines and Technology More
Image
Published: 01 September 2008
Fig. 61 Typical fatigue striations in 7075 aluminum More
Image
Published: 01 December 2015
Fig. 27 Examples of SCC in mode 1 and mode 3. (a) Susceptibility of 7075 aluminum alloy to corrosion cracking in 3.5% NaCl solution tension. Mode 1 and torsion (solid lines). Mode 3 tests (dashed lines). P, peak and aging; OA, overaged; UA, underaged. (b) Crack velocity versus stress intensity More
Image
Published: 01 June 2008
Fig. 26.4 Effect of heat treatment on 2024 and 7075. YS, yield strength; UTS, ultimate tensile strength. Source: Ref 7 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 8.6 Stress-corrosion cracking of alloy 7075-T651 plate. Shaded bands indicate combinations of stress and time known to produce SCC in specimens intermittently immersed in 3.5% NaCl solution. Point A is minimum yield strength in the long-transverse direction for a 75 mm (3 in.) thick plate. More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 8.7 Comparison of residual stresses in a thick, constant cross-section 7075-T6 aluminum alloy plate before and after stress relief. (a) High residual stresses in the solution-treated and quenched alloy. (b) Reduction in stresses after stretching 2%. Source: Ref 8.18 More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 17.16 Effect of temper on SCC performance of aluminum alloy 7075 subjected to alternate immersion in 3.5% NaCl solution at a stress of 207 MPa (30 ksi). Mean flaw depth was calculated from the average breaking strength of five specimens subjected to identical conditions. Source: Ref More
Image
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 17.42 Anodic polarization curves for aluminum alloy 7075-T651 in deaerated 3.5% NaCl solution showing the domains of behavior predicted from the curve. Source: Ref 17.73 More
Image
Published: 01 April 2013
Fig. 7 Band of shrinkage cavities and internal cracks in a 7075-T6 forging. The cracks developed from the cavities, which were produced during solidification of the ingot and which remained during forging because of inadequate cropping. Etched with Keller’s reagent. Original magnification 9 More
Image
Published: 01 October 2012
Fig. 2.12 Effect of heat treatment on 2024 and 7075. YS, yield strength; UTS, ultimate tensile strength More
Image
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 27 Aluminum alloys 2124 and 7475 are tougher versions of alloys 2024 and 7075. High-purity metal (low iron and silicon) and special processing techniques are needed to optimize toughness in these materials. Source: Ref 13 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 29 Variation in rotating beam fatigue for (a) 2024-T4, (b) 7075-T6, (c) 2014-T6, and (d) 7079-T6 alloys. Notches (60°) were very sharp ( K t > 12), with a radius of approximately 0.005 mm (0.0002 in.). Results are from over a thousand rotating beam tests performed in the 1940s More
Image
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 30 Comparison of fatigue strength bands for 2014-T6, 2024-T4, and 7075-T6 aluminum alloys for rotating beam tests. Source: Ref 16 More
Image
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 33 Axial stress fatigue strength of 0.8 mm (0.030 in.) 2024, 7075, and clad sheet in air and seawater, R = 0. Source: Ref 19 More