The quill shaft in an aircraft engine was found in two pieces following a flameout. One piece was short, straight, and otherwise undamaged; the other piece was bent in several places as was the sleeve that covered it. The facture surface, as viewed under optical and scanning electron microscopes, was flat and shiny with deformation marks and dimples, typical of torsional overload, and signs of severe rubbing on the periphery. Based on their observations, investigators concluded that the quill shaft failed by torsional overload, the source of which could not be determined.

A cardon shaft operating in an aircraft engine failed and was taken out and analyzed to determine the cause. A photograph of the broken shaft in the as-received condition shows the location and orientation of the fracture. The fracture surface appeared smooth, indicating that a considerable amount of rubbing occurred after the shaft broke. SEM fractography revealed deformation marks and elongated dimples, typical of shear overloads, along with other details. Based on their analysis, investigators concluded that the cardan shaft failed under torsional overload. They also cited a need for a more detailed examination of the driven end of the shaft.

Several components from the tail boom of a helicopter were found fractured at a crash site, including gusset plates, the hat section near the lower yoke, and a cable that controls the pitch of the tail rotor. The components were recovered from the wreckage and taken to a lab for closer examination. Based on their observations and the results of SEM fractography, failure analysts concluded that the gusset plates failed due to a downward bending overload in tension and that the tail rotor control cable snapped due to tensile overload. There were no indications of delayed failure in any of the areas examined.