Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Subjects
Article Type
Volume Subject Area
Date
Availability
1-4 of 4
Yu Hsiang Shu
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2015, ISTFA 2015: Conference Proceedings from the 41st International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 290-294, November 1–5, 2015,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
Voltage contrast (VC) is a useful technique and used widely in failure analysis of integrated circuit (ICs). This paper will demonstrate different FIB current intensities in a specific VC case and, by means of the technique, locate possible defect sites quickly. With the help of conductive atomic force microscopy (C-AFM), we can get an electrical verification at the same time. We discuss the relationship of VC and C-AFM as well as what the root cause of failure is in this case.
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2011, ISTFA 2011: Conference Proceedings from the 37th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 434-438, November 13–17, 2011,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
Using nanoprobing techniques to accomplish transistor parametric data has been reported as a method of failure analysis in nanometer scale defect. In this paper, we focus on how to identify the influence of Contact high resistance on device soft failures using nanoprobing analysis, and showing that the equivalent mathematical models could be used to describe the corresponding electrical data in a device with Contact high resistance issue. A case study was presented to verify that Contact volcano defect caused Contact high resistance issue, and this issue can be identified via physical failure analysis (PFA) method (e.g. Transmission Electron Microscope and Focus Ion Beam techniques) and nanoprobing analysis method. Finally, we would explain the physical root cause of Contact volcano issue.
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2010, ISTFA 2010: Conference Proceedings from the 36th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 233-235, November 14–18, 2010,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
IR-OBIRCH (Infrared Ray – Optical Beam Induced Resistance Change) is one of the main failure analysis techniques [1] [2] [3] [4]. It is a useful tool to do fault localization on leakage failure cases such as poor Via or contact connection, FEoL or BEoL pattern bridge, and etc. But the real failure sites associated with the above failure mechanisms are not always found at the OBIRCH spot locations. Sometimes the real failure site is far away from the OBIRCH spot and it will result in inconclusive PFA Analysis. Finding the real failure site is what matters the most for fault localization detection. In this paper, we will introduce one case using deep sub-micron process generation which suffers serious high Isb current at wafer donut region. In this case study a BEoL Via poor connection is found far away from the OBIRCH spots. This implies that layout tracing skill and relation investigation among OBIRCH spots are needed for successful failure analysis.
Proceedings Papers
ISTFA2008, ISTFA 2008: Conference Proceedings from the 34th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, 269-272, November 2–6, 2008,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
Conventional isolation techniques, such as Optical Beam Induced Resistance Change (OBIRCH) or photoemission microscopy (PEM) frequently fail to locate failure points when only applied to power pin of the semiconductor device. In this paper, a novel OBIRCH failure isolation technique is utilized to detect leakage failures. Different test conditions are presented to identify the differences in current when all input pins are pulled high in an OBIRCH system. In order to verify a failure point, it is necessary to perform electrical analysis of the suspected failure point in the failing sample. In general, Conductive Atomic Force Microscope (C-AFM) and a Nano-Prober is sufficient to provide the electrical data required for failure analysis. Experiment results, however, prove that this novel OBIRCH failure isolation technique is effective in locating the failure point, especially for leakage failures. The failure mechanism is illustrated using cross-sectional TEM.