In a failure event, circuit schematic analysis usually follows after fault isolation to increase the success rate. However, analyzing an extracted netlist of the isolated sub-circuit can be messy. Manual circuit translation from layout where the analyst is in control of the cell instance placement is one way to overcome this challenge. Although it is neater and intuitive for analysis, it can be time consuming to create the schematic. To analyze circuits in a systematic manner, cross-mapping between layout and schematic contents is the most commonly recognized approach. However, at times, cross-mapping alone is insufficient and some further simplification procedures are favorable. This paper describes the challenges and illustrates using real case studies, how schematics re-ordering and substitutions can be useful to simplify and enhance circuit analysis. These procedures can be implemented in an automated manner to enhance turnaround time for analysis.

A phase-locked loop (PLL) is commonly used in integrated circuit devices for frequency control. In a finished product, it comprises of sub-building blocks operating in a closed-loop control system which do not have register readback or test access points for easy debugging. Failure analysis becomes a challenge. This paper demonstrates the inherent limitation of relying only on dynamic fault isolation techniques, in specific frequency mapping for PLL failure debug. A systematic debug approach that combines volume failure characterization on test, additional characterization using dynamic photon emission and design simulation is then presented. Results are obtained on a 28 nm node device.