The steam generation systems (SGS) of concentrated solar power (CSP) plants employ multiple heat exchangers arranged in series to convert thermal energy collected from the sun via a heat transfer fluid (HTF) to produce superheated steam in the Rankine cycle. Common CSP plant designs are based either on parabolic trough or central tower technology. The major Rankine cycle components consist of preheaters, evaporators, steam drums, superheaters, steam turbines, and water/air-cooled condensers, all connected through steel piping. For CSP plants capable of reheating the steam for improved efficiency, reheaters are also included in the Rankine cycle. In central tower design with directly heated water as the HTF, the receiver can also be considered part of the Rankine cycle. Operating experiences of CSP plants indicate that plant reliability is significantly impacted by failures in various components of the Rankine cycle. Many damage mechanisms have been identified, which include corrosion, thermal fatigue, creep, and stress corrosion cracking, among others. Much of the damage can be attributed to poor water/steam chemistry and inadequate temperature control. While damage in the Rankine cycle components is common, there is generally lack of comprehensive guidelines created specifically for the operation of these CSP components. Therefore, to improve CSP plant reliability and profitability, it is necessary to better understand the various damage mechanisms experienced by linking them to specific operating conditions, followed by developing a “theory and practice” guideline document for the CSP operators, so that failures in the Rankine cycle components can be minimized. In a major research project sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), effort is being undertaken by EPRI to develop such a guideline document exclusively for the CSP industry. This paper provides an overview of the ongoing DOE project along with a few examples of component failures experienced in the Rankine cycle.

In this work, two unique heats of 9Cr creep strength enhanced ferritic (CSEF) steels extracted from a retired superheat outlet header after 141,000 hours of service were evaluated. These two CSEF steels were a forging manufactured to SA-182 F91 (F91) reducer and a seamless pipe produced to SA-335 P91 (P91) pipe. Their creep deformation and fracture behavior were assessed using a lever arm creep frame integrated with in-situ high-temperature digital image correlation (DIC) system. Critical metallurgical and microstructure factors, including composition, service damage, grain matrix degradation, precipitates, and inclusions were quantitatively characterized to link the performance of the two service aged F91 and P91 CSEF steels. The creep test results show the F91 and P91 steels exhibit a large variation in creep strength and creep ductility. The F91 steel fractured at 572 hours while P91 steel fractured at 1,901 hours when subjected to a test condition of 650 °C and 100 MPa. The nominal creep strains at fracture were 12.5% (F91) and 14.5% (P91), respectively. The high-resolution DIC strain measurements reveal the local creep strain in F91 was about 50% while the local creep strain in P91 was >80%. The characterization results show that the F91 steel possessed pre-existing creep damage from its time in service, a higher fraction of inclusions, and a faster matrix grain coarsening rate. These features contribute to the observed reduction in performance for the F91 steel. The context for these findings, and the importance of metallurgical risk in an integrated life management approach will be emphasized.