Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Subjects
Article Type
Volume Subject Area
Date
Availability
1-1 of 1
Stanley F. Rutkowski
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
HT 2021, Heat Treat 2021: Extended Abstracts from the 31st Heat Treating Society Conference and Exposition, 18-21, September 14–16, 2021,
Abstract
View Papertitled, Reducing Furnace Operating Costs: IGBT/MFDC Technology Saves on Energy
View
PDF
for content titled, Reducing Furnace Operating Costs: IGBT/MFDC Technology Saves on Energy
This paper describes a furnace retrofit involving the replacement of a variable reactance transformer (VRT) with an IGBT-controlled mid-frequency direct current (MFDC) transformer. The two transformers are similar in size and all other variables remained essentially equivalent. A typical heating cycle was initiated with a ramp rate of 10°F/min to a soak temperature of approximately 1900°F. Cross-sectional data was taken during the ramp phase and soak phase. Based on power measurements and adjusting for differences in thermal loads, the retrofit achieved a 40% reduction in kilowatt consumption, a 14% reduction in peak current draw, and an improvement in power factor throughout the cycle.