Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Subjects
Article Type
Volume Subject Area
Date
Availability
1-1 of 1
Sonoya Keiji
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
ITSC 2015, Thermal Spray 2015: Proceedings from the International Thermal Spray Conference, 917-924, May 11–14, 2015,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
This paper presents an assessment of the properties of three thermal sprayed coatings for a thermal barrier applied to the piston head of an internal combustion engine. Coating (1) has a topcoat of Al 2 O 3 and a bond coat of Ni-Cr. Coating (2) has a topcoat of YSZ and a bond coat of CoNiCrAlY. Coating (3) is 316 stainless steel. The investigators conducted thermal cycle tests and tensile pin tests, and evaluated the thermal barrier effect of the coatings. The results showed that coating (3) had no cracks or delamination after the thermal cycle test, while coatings (1) and (2) had partial cracks and delamination. Coating (2) had the highest adhesion strength, and its thermal barrier property was better than that of coatings (1) and (3). In terms of cost and overall evaluation, coating (3) was considered the most reasonable and appropriate thermal sprayed coating for the piston head application.