Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- Issue
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Topics
Subjects
Journal
Article Type
Volume Subject Area
Date
Availability
1-2 of 2
Roger Dickenson
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
SMST2024, SMST 2024: Extended Abstracts from the International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies, 119-120, May 6–10, 2024,
Abstract
View Paper
PDF
There are two primary test methods used in industry to evaluate nitinol phase transformations, bend free recovery (BFR) per ASTM F2082 and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) per ASTM F2004. Both methods are widely used, but the correlation between the method outputs for Austenite Finish (Af) temperature is not fully characterized. This can be challenging when different methods are specified or preferred by suppliers, customers, and manufacturers. DSC is a method that measures the change in energy as a function of temperature; it is a strictly thermal method. Whereas BFR monitors the displacement of a sample as temperature increases. There is a lack of published data discussing how different wire processing inputs impact the correlation between these two outputs.
Journal Articles
Journal: AM&P Technical Articles
AM&P Technical Articles (2016) 174 (1): 30–33.
Published: 01 January 2016
Abstract
View article
PDF
A new solid-state joining process for medical guidewire applications increases joint strength, provides superior bending properties, and does not require tertiary metals or ferrules. This process may be a superior method to create joints between dissimilar metals such as stainless steel and Nitinol.