Near Infra-Red (NIR) techniques such as Laser Voltage Probing/Imaging (LVP/I), Dynamic Laser Stimulation (DLS), and Photon Emission Microscopy (PEM) are indispensable for Electrical Fault Isolation/Electrical Failure Analysis (EFI/EFA) of silicon Integrated Circuit (IC) devices. However, upcoming IC architectures based on Buried Power Rails (BPR) with Backside Power Delivery (BPD) networks will greatly reduce the usefulness of these techniques due to the presence of NIR-opaque layers that block access to the transistor active layer. Alternative techniques capable of penetrating these opaque layers are therefore of great interest. Recent developments in intense, focused X-ray microbeams for micro X-Ray Fluorescence (μXRF) microscopy open the possibility to using X-rays for targeted and intentional device alteration. In this paper, we will present results from our preliminary investigations into X-ray Device Alteration (XDA) of flip-chip packaged FinFET devices and discuss some implications of our findings for EFI/EFA.

High core-Vdd overvoltage latchup margins in CMOS ICs are required to enable many reliability screens (e.g., DVS and HTOL testing). We introduce an efficient way to isolate defects that degrade these margins using PEM and 1064/1340 nm CW laser-stimulation. Current pulses from a current amplifier are used to rapidly charge and discharge the DUT power rail to repetitively ramp Vdd to (or near) the latchup threshold. The characteristic drop in Vdd when latchup is induced is used to generate a latchup flag for laser-stimulation mapping. Latchup events are automatically terminated and latchup durations are minimized, leading to high stability/repeatability of the technique. Isolations down to the cell level were successfully performed in sub-14 nm FinFET test vehicles. This level of isolation is unmatched and this is the first reported use of thermal laser stimulation for latchup investigations. In one provided example, the latchup trigger was isolated to FET based decoupling capacitors (decaps) widely used as fill.

Static Random-Access Memory (SRAM) failure analysis (FA) is important during chip-level reliability evaluation and yield improvement. Single-bit, paired-bit, and quad-bit failures—whose defect should be at the failing bit-cell locations—can be directly sent for Physical Failure Analysis (PFA). For one or multiple row/column failures with too large of a suspected circuit area, more detailed fault isolation is required before PFA. Currently, Photon Emission Microscopy (PEM) is the most commonly used Electrical Failure Analysis (EFA) technique for this kind of fail [1]. Soft-Defect Localization / Dynamic Laser Stimulation (SDL/DLS) can also be applied on soft (Vmin) row/column fails for further isolation [2]. However, some failures do not have abnormal emission spots or DLS sensitivity and require different localization techniques. Laser Voltage Imaging (LVI) and Laser Voltage Probing (LVP) are widely established for logic EFA, [3] but require periodic activation via ATE which may not be possible using MBIST hardware and test-patterns optimized for fast production testing. This paper discusses the test setup challenges to enable LVI & LVP on SRAM fails and includes two case studies on <14 nm advanced process silicon.

Using a laser to purposely damage (or zap) a static random-access memory (SRAM) bitcell for bitmap validation purposes is a well-established technique. However, the absence of visible damage in FinFET SRAM cells, amongst other things, makes precision zapping in these devices more difficult. In this paper, we describe system enhancements and a modified workflow for bitmap validation of these devices using precision, near-infrared (NIR) laser-induced damage. We also explore the use of laser perturbation and non-precision zapping options. Examples are provided.

Driven by the need for higher test-compression, increasingly many chip-makers are adopting new DFT architectures such as “Extreme-Compression” (XTR, supported by Synopsys) with on-chip pattern generation and MISR based compression of chain output data. This paper discusses test-loop requirements in general and gives Advantest 93k specific guidelines on test-pattern release and ATE setup necessary to enable the most established EFA techniques such as LVP and SDL (aka DLS, LADA) within the XTR test architecture.